I had downloaded and installed QE-5.0.2 from
http://qe-forge.org/gf/project/q-e/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&frs_package_id=18
and then applied the patch "missing.diff" will it be ok or do I have to
apply any other patches??
Surender
IIT Bombay, India
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 17:24 +0200, Thomas
On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 22:15 +0530, Surender wrote:
> I had downloaded and installed QE-5.0.2 from
>
> http://qe-forge.org/gf/project/q-e/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&frs_package_id=18
>
> and then applied the patch "missing.diff"
you should have downloaded and applied the patches that
are avai
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 17:24 +0200, Thomas Gruber wrote:
> from 2013-02-01
this is the date of the release. Unfortunately qe-forge doesn't
seem to keep track of the date of the individual files in a release
> To patch "missing.diff" after "espresso-5.0.2-5.0.3.diff" is useless
it is
> and to
uot;
will give the correct results?
Thanks.
Thomas Gruber
On 05/07/2013 12:00 PM, pw_forum-request at pwscf.org wrote:
> Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 16:30:12 +0800 From: Wei-Bing Zhang
> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Correct patches
> for Quantum Espresso v5.0.2 To: PWSCF Forum Cc:
> Br
Dear all
I just give a quick feedback about the latest patches for QE-5.0.3.
A few months ago, I posted a question about negative frequency of
silicene with high q-points above 6x6x1 (
http://qe-forge.org/pipermail/pw_forum/2013-January/100945.html ) but
did not get an answer.
Today, I have reco
The patch file for v.5.0.2 uploaded to qe-forge was
promising in the release notes a number of bug fixes
to the phonon code that were not actually present.
I have uploaded a new version of the patches under
release "5.0.3" to qe-forge. Attached here the missing
patches. Sorry for the inconvenienc
