[Pw_forum] Pseudo-potential testing

2011-05-30 Thread Gabriele Sclauzero
Hello, Il giorno 27/mag/2011, alle ore 20.05, Tram Bui ha scritto: > Dear Gabriele, > Thank you for your respond. Just to make sure that I'm understanding your > answer correctly, below is a shortcut on the output file of my PP testing: > > -- Testing the pseudopotentia

[Pw_forum] Pseudo-potential testing

2011-05-27 Thread Tram Bui
Dear Gabriele, Thank you for your respond. Just to make sure that I'm understanding your answer correctly, below is a shortcut on the output file of my PP testing: -- Testing the pseudopotential -- scalar relativistic calculation atomic numb

[Pw_forum] Pseudo-potential testing

2011-05-26 Thread Gabriele Sclauzero
Il giorno 26/mag/2011, alle ore 01.00, Tram Bui ha scritto: > Dear Paul, >In the file that I have attached here (Paul's note on PP generation), > under section 3.10: checking for transferability, you have mentioned about > the:"The error on total energy di?erences > between PP and AE re

[Pw_forum] Pseudo-potential testing

2011-05-25 Thread Tram Bui
Dear Dr. Paolo Giannozzi, I'm so sorry I got your name wrong on the last email. Please forgive my mistake. Sincerely, Tram Bui On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Tram Bui wrote: > Dear Paul, >In the file that I have attached here (Paul's note on PP > generation), under section 3.10: c

[Pw_forum] Pseudo-potential testing

2011-05-25 Thread Tram Bui
Dear Paul, In the file that I have attached here (Paul's note on PP generation), under section 3.10: checking for transferability, you have mentioned about the:"The error on total energy di?erences between PP and AE results gives a feeling on how good the PP is." Do you mean the difference i