Hello,
Well, my card is actually GTX1060 but I didn't bought it especially for
calculations.
Just from my built-in curiosity, and I know the game is not worth the
candle, I want try to run it anyway and close that 'chapter' of my life
:) I will post here some tests results - as I was
On Dec 30, 2016, at 3:48 AM, Oliver Generalao
wrote:
> The only catch, which Mr Spiga always points out, is that the DP performance
> on GTX cards is very slow , which is like 1/32 (or 1/24) of the Single
> Precision
So GTX 1070 is not worth using. A little bit
Hello Oliver,
Many thanks for quick response. According to Your post it seems that You
know well what to change and where to do those changes. Could You please
provide more informations? Maybe something more specific?
Konrad
W dniu 30.12.2016 o 04:48, Oliver Generalao pisze:
> Hi Konrad,
>
>
Hi Konrad,
Nvidia GTX 1060 is sm_61 and per https://github.com/fspiga/QE-GPU, it
supports up to sm_60, based on my experience QE-GPU will compile with
sm_61 however when you run pw-gpu.x it will throw errors, hence there
should be a slight modification on the QE-GPU source code to include
sm_61,
Hi Konrad,
My experience with QE-GPU is that it works only with double precision
supported GPUs but not single precision.
I am using TitanZ and Intel compiler, it works fast. Here is my ./configure
./configure CC=icc F90=ifort F77=ifort MPIF90=mpiifort --enable-parallel
--disable-openmp
Deer community,
Recently I'm trying to compile and run QE-GPU version on my new Cuda
capable card. Unfortunately after many attempts the result is poor.
I have Nvidia GTX 1060 (with Pascal architecture, 1280 cuda units). I've
managed to compile GPU PWSCF with sm_60 (pascal) support but when