[Pw_forum] Questions on ibrav in pw.x

2013-05-28 Thread Yantao Wu
Thank you! It makes much more sense now. On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Axel Kohlmeyer wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Yantao Wu wrote: > > Dear QE, > > > > I'm wondering what ibrav means in pw.x. My confusion is that if you can > > specify atomic positions freely, isn't the struct

[Pw_forum] Questions on ibrav in pw.x

2013-05-28 Thread Axel Kohlmeyer
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Yantao Wu wrote: > Dear QE, > > I'm wondering what ibrav means in pw.x. My confusion is that if you can > specify atomic positions freely, isn't the structure of the solid already > implied by the positions? So why do we need the extra variable of ibrav. Or > does

[Pw_forum] Questions on ibrav in pw.x

2013-05-28 Thread mohnish pandey
Hi Yantao, A crystal is defined as lattice + basis. A bulk crystal has an infinite size (infinite is a good approximation for the bulk description) and made of identical units (which is one unitcell). So you need to know the geometry of the unitcell (which is lattice) and what is it composed of (w

[Pw_forum] Questions on ibrav in pw.x

2013-05-28 Thread Yantao Wu
Dear QE, I'm wondering what ibrav means in pw.x. My confusion is that if you can specify atomic positions freely, isn't the structure of the solid already implied by the positions? So why do we need the extra variable of ibrav. Or does ibrav carries more meaning than just the initial lattice struc