[Pw_forum] Si diamond-cubic to beta-Sn transformation

2010-10-08 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Oct 8, 2010, at 22:05 , Daryl Chrzan wrote: > I still believe that there are 2 atoms per unit cell in the beta-Sn > structure, so I am a bit confused by your final statement > don't take it too seriously: I interpreted the "4a" positions mentioned in

[Pw_forum] Si diamond-cubic to beta-Sn transformation

2010-10-08 Thread Mike Mehl
Not quite: celldm(1) =11.15433936, celldm(3) =0.54170527 On 10/08/2010 03:55 PM, Daryl Chrzan wrote: > Michael, > > Thank you for the response. I agree that I am far from the minimum. > However, when I do get to the minimum, I end up with a c/a ratio that is far > off, and an energy

[Pw_forum] Si diamond-cubic to beta-Sn transformation

2010-10-08 Thread Daryl Chrzan
Paolo, The smearing flag solved the problems. Thank you much for the tip (on behalf of myself and my class). I agree this is an excellent teaching exercise. Mark Asta suggested it to me, and it seems perfect. I still believe that there are 2 atoms per unit cell in the beta-Sn structure, so

[Pw_forum] Si diamond-cubic to beta-Sn transformation

2010-10-08 Thread Daryl Chrzan
Michael, Thank you for the response. I agree that I am far from the minimum. However, when I do get to the minimum, I end up with a c/a ratio that is far off, and an energy difference of 0.6 eV, about twice what you find. (I have, I believe, accounted for the proper number of atoms, etc.)

[Pw_forum] Si diamond-cubic to beta-Sn transformation

2010-10-08 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
Daryl Chrzan wrote: > smearing = 'gaussian', > degauss = 0.02, you need occupations='smearing' as well, or else the code will silently default to fixed occupations. There should be a check and a warning, but there isn't any. Using QE in teaching is a great way to find all kinds of problems. I

[Pw_forum] Si diamond-cubic to beta-Sn transformation

2010-10-07 Thread mohnish pandey
Dear Prof Daryl ! Can you please attach your VASP file also so that I can have a closer look at your VASP file. In fact I did the calculation with your input file and after optimizing the structure I was getting the energy difference of 0.69 ev/atom. I just wanted to see

[Pw_forum] Si diamond-cubic to beta-Sn transformation

2010-10-05 Thread Mike Mehl
Dayrl, Looking at your output, it seems that you are very far from the minimum energy beta-Sn structure: entering subroutine stress ... total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar) P= 42.95 0.00079257 0. 0. 116.59 0.00 0.00 0.

[Pw_forum] Si diamond-cubic to beta-Sn transformation

2010-10-05 Thread Daryl Chrzan
Input files were stripped on the previous message. Here they are as part of the message: Diamond Cubic: calculation='scf' restart_mode='from_scratch', prefix='silicon', tstress= .true. tprnfor= .true. pseudo_dir='/Users/darylchrzan/ResearchProjects/PSEUDOS/',

[Pw_forum] Si diamond-cubic to beta-Sn transformation

2010-10-05 Thread Daryl Chrzan
Colleagues, I am working through a problem that I have assigned to my Computational Materials Science class - computation of the transition pressure for the diamond-cubic to beta-Sn structures in diamond using pw.x. The problem I have is that pw.x produces answers that are inconsistent with