[Pw_forum] big difference between "total magnetization" and "absolute magnetization" for 4f elements

2013-03-14 Thread 琨陶
Dear everyone and Stefano, In order to find the reason for the problem, I changed some parameters in the input file to print out the occupation number for each atom as following: calculation='scf' restart_mode='from_scratch', prefix='Gd', pseudo_dir = './' outdir='./', /

[Pw_forum] big difference between "total magnetization" and "absolute magnetization" for 4f elements

2013-03-14 Thread Stefano de Gironcoli
dear Kun Tao the 3D visualization of the up-down charge density in the different cells you have studied should probably clarify to you what the system is trying to teach you. stefano On 03/13/2013 10:36 PM, ?? wrote: > I try to force two Gd atom into ferromagnetic with following parameters: >

[Pw_forum] big difference between "total magnetization" and "absolute magnetization" for 4f elements

2013-03-14 Thread 琨陶
Dear Stefano, Could you give me some suggestions about how to visualization of the up-down charge density? With regards, Kun Tao On 14 March 2013 05:54, Stefano de Gironcoli wrote: > dear Kun Tao > > the 3D visualization of the up-down charge density in the different > cells you have studied

[Pw_forum] big difference between "total magnetization" and "absolute magnetization" for 4f elements

2013-03-13 Thread mohnish pandey
Did you try using different initial spin configurations? If your interested in FM ground state then may be you should try initial magnetic configuration as FM. e.g. +1, +1 for both. On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:03 PM, ?? wrote: > Thank you for your suggestions. When I set two atoms in the unit

[Pw_forum] big difference between "total magnetization" and "absolute magnetization" for 4f elements

2013-03-13 Thread 琨陶
I try to force two Gd atom into ferromagnetic with following parameters: nat= 2, ntyp=2, starting_magnetization(1)=1.0, starting_magnetization(2)=1.0, ATOMIC_SPECIES Gd1 1.0 Gd.GGA-PBE-paw.UPF Gd2 1.0 Gd.GGA-PBE-paw.UPF ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal} Gd1 0. 0.6667

[Pw_forum] big difference between "total magnetization" and "absolute magnetization" for 4f elements

2013-03-13 Thread Stefano de Gironcoli
are you sure you are defining the correct magnetic structure ? is Gd maybe antiferromagnetic ? stefano On 03/13/2013 03:19 PM, ?? wrote: > Dear everyone, > > I want to calculate the magnetic properties of bulk Gd whose magnetic > moment is about 8 Bohr magneto/atom. Usually, in the output file >

[Pw_forum] big difference between "total magnetization" and "absolute magnetization" for 4f elements

2013-03-13 Thread 琨陶
Thank you for your suggestions. When I set two atoms in the unit cell to be antiferromagnetic, the "total magnetization" is nearly zero, and the "absolute magnetization" is about 14.67. And the magnetic moment for two atoms are about 7.16 and -7.18, which is more or less acceptable. Now, the

[Pw_forum] big difference between "total magnetization" and "absolute magnetization" for 4f elements

2013-03-13 Thread Andrei Malashevich
If you want to model antiferromagnetic structure, you should define two types of atoms, Gd1 and Gd2. Change ntyp to 2. Use, e.g., starting_magnetization(1)=1.0 starting_magnetization(2)=-1.0 ATOMIC_SPECIES Gd1 1.0 Gd.GGA-PBE-paw.UPF Gd2 1.0 Gd.GGA-PBE-paw.UPF ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal} Gd1

[Pw_forum] big difference between "total magnetization" and "absolute magnetization" for 4f elements

2013-03-13 Thread 琨陶
Dear everyone, I want to calculate the magnetic properties of bulk Gd whose magnetic moment is about 8 Bohr magneto/atom. Usually, in the output file values of "total magnetization" and "absolute magnetization" should be nearly the same. However, in my output file, I found a big difference