Dear Paolo
Thank you very much for your help.
Now it works correctly.
Best regards
Mohammad Sandoghchi
--
PhD student
Department of Physics
Sharif University of Technology
Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
email:mohammadsandoghchi at gmail dot com
___
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:52 +0430, Mohammad Sandoghchi wrote:
> Regarding my previous email, it seems that the problem is due to the
> fact that lines 309-328 of new projwfc.f90 is not doing the same job
> as its previous counterpart.
I guess something went wrong in this commit:
http://qe-forge.o
Dear QE Developers and Users
Regarding my previous email, it seems that the problem is due to the fact
that lines 309-328 of new projwfc.f90 is not doing the same job as its
previous counterpart.
Best regards
Mohammad Sandoghchi
--
PhD student
Department of Physics
Sharif University of Technolo
Dear Paolo and QE Users
Actually, I had checked it. The issue is that in QE. ver. 5.0.3 (
k-resolved calculation ) my input files worked without any problem, but
whenever I use ver. 5.1.1 or 5.1.2 ( both k-resolved and fatban
calculation), after getting successful scf and band calculations, and w
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 23:35 +0330, Mohammad Sandoghchi wrote:
> Can anybody check whether projwfc.x works correctly in the new
> versions of Quantum Espresso (5.1.1 & 5.1.2) when "noncolin=.true." is
> used in the input files of scf and band calculations ?
YOU check. If it doesn't work, please r
Dear all
Can anybody check whether projwfc.x works correctly in the new versions of
Quantum Espresso (5.1.1 & 5.1.2) when "noncolin=.true." is used in the input
files of scf and band calculations ?(For example in fatband (PP:example05)
and k-resolved (PP:example02) calculations.)
Thanks
Kind reg
