[Pw_forum] problems with converge of geometric optimization

2010-09-16 Thread Stefano de Gironcoli
0.000369770.00195456 > atom 97 type 1 force = 0.00347151 -0.00182346 -0.00493084 > Total force = 0.025508 Total SCF correction = 0.000128 > > Stephan Rix > Institute for Inorganic und Analytical Chemistry > Johannes Gutenberg-University Mai

[Pw_forum] problems with converge of geometric optimization

2010-09-16 Thread Stephan Rix
Mainz, Germany Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:10:07 +0200 From: Stefano de Gironcoli Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] problems with converge of geometric optimization To: PWSCF Forum Message-ID: <4C90E1CF.6040400 at sissa.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed This h

[Pw_forum] problems with converge of geometric optimization

2010-09-15 Thread Stefano de Gironcoli
This happens when the energy landscape become noisy compared with the expected energy decrease in the relaxation steps. This can happen when you are very close to the minimum. How large are your forces ? How tight is your force/energy threshold ? stefano Stephan Rix wrote: > I am trying to calcu

[Pw_forum] problems with converge of geometric optimization

2010-09-15 Thread Stephan Rix
I am trying to calculate an H-center in CaF2, and I am having trouble with the geometry optimization. I have tried adjusting various parameters such as ion dynamics, trust radius, convergence tresholds, but it seems that convergence cannot be improved. Using bfgs I always get the following error:

[Pw_forum] problems with converge of geometric optimization

2010-09-15 Thread jia chen
Hi Stephan, If the only problem is bfgs, you can change ion_dynamics to damp. Regards -- Jia Chen Dept of Chemistry Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544