[Pw_forum] scf calculation stops after 'Starting wfc are 476 atomic wfcs' without other informaiton

2013-06-24 Thread Yong Xue
Dear all I want to calculate nmr for a system with C, H, and O. however, the scf calculation stops after printing out 'Starting wfc are 476 atomic wfcs' and gives no other information. Can anybody helps me to find the reason? thanks in advance here is my input calculation = 'scf' restart_mode

[Pw_forum] scf calculation stops at starting wfc ...

2013-05-16 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 08:21 +0200, mohnish pandey wrote: > Do you really need this high cutoff as pointed out by Jia? with norm-conserving PP high cutoffs may be required > Just a side note: I think starting with 'atomic + random' is a better > choice rather than just 'atomic'. 'safer'

[Pw_forum] scf calculation stops at starting wfc ...

2013-05-16 Thread mohnish pandey
Dear Xue, Do you really need this high cutoff as pointed out by Jia? Just a side note: I think starting with 'atomic + random' is a better choice rather than just 'atomic'. On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Jia Chen wrote: > Hello, > > 1000 states with 100Ry as cutoff. I guess you really need

[Pw_forum] scf calculation stops at starting wfc ...

2013-05-15 Thread Jia Chen
Hello, 1000 states with 100Ry as cutoff. I guess you really need to wait for a while... On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Yong Xue wrote: > Dear All > I am doing a relax calculation for a system composed of Na, Si, and O. > However, the calculations stops printing any results though it is

[Pw_forum] scf calculation stops at starting wfc ...

2013-05-15 Thread Yong Xue
Dear All I am doing a relax calculation for a system composed of Na, Si, and O. However, the calculations stops printing any results though it is still in running. The last line in the output file: starting charge 886.76971, renormalised to 1024.0 Starting wfc are 1232 atomic wfcs