[Pw_forum] slow relaxing

2008-05-11 Thread Stefano Baroni
a few remarks for the benefit of the less experienced members of the forum: On May 11, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Nicola Marzari wrote: > ideally, if you have 18 atoms, i.e. 56 degrees of freedom (or 53, if > you > remove traslations) a conjugate gradient algorithms should bring you > to > the mini

[Pw_forum] slow relaxing

2008-05-11 Thread Axel Kohlmeyer
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Stefano Baroni wrote: perhaps one more comment on top of that mentioning a subject that is easily forgotten. i noticed that in the example input the wavefunction cutoff was chosen somewhat low (if not too low at 60ry) for norm-conserving pseudopotentials on an oxygen conta

[Pw_forum] slow relaxing

2008-05-11 Thread Nicola Marzari
hi Rudra, ideally, if you have 18 atoms, i.e. 56 degrees of freedom (or 53, if you remove traslations) a conjugate gradient algorithms should bring you to the minimum in 53 steps. You are not far away from that - you are using bfgs (not sure if there is an analytic results on the minimum numbe

[Pw_forum] slow relaxing

2008-05-11 Thread Rudra Banerjee
i am trying to do this PW calculation(water once again), but as you can see, the convergence ratio is very slow...is there any way to speed up the relaxation? 1 &CONTROL 2 calculation = 'relax' , 3 restart_mode = 'restart' , 4