Dear all

Hello.

My question is related to how to use wannier90.

In "wannier90.win" file, I heard that as the value of "num_iter(tag in 
wannier90.win)" is higher, spread of Wannier function(=WF) is gradually lower 
in wannier 90.

Q1) If so, is this procedure that minimize the spread of WF meaningful 
physically??. I think this procedure doesn't represent any material's property, 
because this procedure can change the picture of WF at any time.

If I use a lot of "num_iter" for any orbital, the spread will be minimized.

Q2) In this case, when different people draw the maximally minimized WF for the 
same material, is there the method they can be compared?
Or is there a standard value for minimizing the spread of WF?

I would like to know the criteria for WF being minimized and then compare my WF 
with other pepole's.


Q3) Would you share paper related to my question?



Thank you.


Gwanju Institute Science and Technonlogy.
Yongsik Lym.
_______________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to