Re: [QE-users] Doubling the k points - Reg

2020-07-03 Thread rekha sharma
Hii, I am not expert on QE but I can guide you here. How you can say that 4 4 4 0 0 0 is fit for your scf? In the same way you can decide for nscf. I usually do a convergence test for k-mesh with 2X+2, 2X+4,2X+6 and so on, where X is my starting mesh size, and see whether my required properties a

[QE-users] Doubling the k points - Reg

2020-07-03 Thread singaravelan T R
Dear sir, For example say :Si. For that I have done the proper convergence test and my convergence says using my brain I am not doing blindly sir . It is 4 4 4 0 0 0 and is fit for the scf calculation. *My question is: For nscf calculation will I need to double the k points or not?* *Or there any

Re: [QE-users] Doubling the k points - reg

2020-07-02 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
Then for nscf calculation k points is 8 8 8 0 0 0 Is my argument is correct, please rectify? You should use the opportune number of k-points for each calculation by doing proper test convergence and analyzing the results with your brain. Blindly multiplying by two is not a good idea. kind re

[QE-users] Doubling the k points - reg

2020-07-02 Thread singaravelan T R
Respected sir/madam, If I am doing scf calculation say for silicon, then for nscf calculation do I need to double the no of k points. For eg: optimized k points for Si. for scf calculation is 4 4 4 0 0 0 Then for nscf calculation k points is 8 8 8 0 0 0 Is my argument is correct, please rectify? Wi