Dear Paolo Giannozzi
I think that the LDA+1/2 method is not implemented for PAW, because when
i made another lda-1/2 test for USPP pseudopotential for Sb atom, it worked
normally without any segmentation fault. However, iam interested in the PAW
pseudopotential Is there any solution
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 1:37 PM, BENYAHIA NEZHA
wrote:
I think that the LDA+1/2 method is not implemented for PAW, because
> when i made another lda-1/2 test for USPP pseudopotential for Sb atom, it
> worked normally without any segmentation fault. However, iam interested in
> the PAW pseu
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 7:01 PM, Paolo Giannozzi
wrote:
figure out why it crashes. Most likely the code is accessing an unallocated
> variable. It might be sufficient to properly allocated PAW variables to
> avoid yhe crash.
>
sorry for the bad syntax: "It might be sufficient to properly ALLOCATE