Re: [QE-users] Inconsistency of vc-relax output file

2019-07-11 Thread Bharat Thapa
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 9:15 pm, Bharat Thapa wrote: > Dear Paolo, > > Sorry for the late reply, however, I am wondering in this case, how do I > calculate the vc-relaxed lattice parameter? If it were cubic I would have > multiplied the output CELL_PARAMETER with the lattice and divided by 0.5. > B

Re: [QE-users] Inconsistency of vc-relax output file

2019-07-08 Thread Bharat Thapa
Dear Paolo, Sorry for the late reply, however, I am wondering in this case, how do I calculate the vc-relaxed lattice parameter? If it were cubic I would have multiplied the output CELL_PARAMETER with the lattice and divided by 0.5. But, as it is hexagonal (input) how do I figure out the relaxed l

Re: [QE-users] Inconsistency of vc-relax output file

2019-03-24 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
Is the problem here the loss of the original symmetry of the lattice? if hexagonal symmetry was present in the starting structure, it isn't lost at the end (apart from pathological or unfortunate cases). If hexagonal symmetry was not present in the starting structure, the final lattice may no longe

[QE-users] Inconsistency of vc-relax output file

2019-03-22 Thread Bharat Thapa
Dear developer, I have vc-relaxed Hf7O8N4 (hafnium oxynitride) assuming the crystal to be rhombohedra with a=b, alpha=beta=90 deg, and gamma=120 deg. So, I used ibrav=4 and gave A,B,C, cosAB, cosAC and cosBC values. Part of the input looks as follows: *&system* *ibrav= 4