Re: [QE-users] Ionic + hartree potential

2021-03-25 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
"e*V" is meant to indicate "charge times potential", as opposed to "potential", not "electronvolt". Energies are in atomic Ry units unless otherwise stated, so your potential (energy) in the vacuum is around 14 eV Paolo On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 2:23 PM Offermans Willem wrote: > Dear Quantum

[QE-users] Ionic + hartree potential

2021-03-25 Thread Offermans Willem
Dear Quantum Espresso friends, I have relaxed a Pt(111) surface with 5 metal layers and S_2 symmetry :) To validate the calculations, I like to plot the x,y-averaged electrostatic potential along the z-coordinate of the unit cell. I have used pp.x and the following input file (pt.ppi) to