Re: [QE-users] LIBXC versus internal QE functionals

2024-05-26 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On 5/26/24 23:20, Abdesalem Houari via users wrote: After checking well the exchange-correlation document (Modules/funct.f90), my first issue seems resolved. and the second as well: absolute energies depend upon the pseudopotentials Paolo I found that "pbe"   = "sla+pw+pbx+pbc" (= XC-001I

Re: [QE-users] LIBXC versus internal QE functionals

2024-05-26 Thread Abdesalem Houari via users
Dear All, I'm sorry, I have written my previous email in rush !After checking well the exchange-correlation document (Modules/funct.f90), my first issue seems resolved. I found that "pbe"   = "sla+pw+pbx+pbc" (= XC-001I-004I-003I-004I-000I-000I).So the true PBE needs, not only "pbx" exchange +

[QE-users] LIBXC versus internal QE functionals

2024-05-26 Thread Abdesalem Houari via users
Dear All, I wanted to do a calculation test using PBE-functional from LIBXC and compare it to the internal QE one. As a test, I opted for body centered cubic (bcc) iron. I'm a bit puzzled by the differences in the results. - First, for PBE from LIBXC, following the QE user-guide on how to use LIB