Re: [QE-users] NEB calculation issue with 'fixed' atoms

2019-10-25 Thread Laurent Pizzagalli
Dear Giuseppe, you are certainly right, according to the generated output files. It was not explicitely mentioned in the documentation (or I did not find it), and I (wrongly) supposed that it could work. Thank you for your help. Best regards Laurent On 24/10/2019 20:16, Giuseppe Mattioli

Re: [QE-users] NEB calculation issue with 'fixed' atoms

2019-10-25 Thread Laurent Pizzagalli
Dear Pietro, thank you for your help. I think that your description of what happened is probably accurate, because the displacement of the 'fixed' atoms is a bit unexpected (actually, these atoms are fixed so as to maintain a stress on a defect, and the stress field is changing as a function o

Re: [QE-users] NEB calculation issue with 'fixed' atoms

2019-10-24 Thread Giuseppe Mattioli
Dear Laurent AFAIK, in NEB you can only fix atoms once, in the initial image, and keep them fixed across the whole reaction coordinate (no need to add 0 0 0 in images 2...final). HTH Giuseppe Pietro Delugas ha scritto: Dear Laurent It might be that the  fixed-position acts only at the "

Re: [QE-users] NEB calculation issue with 'fixed' atoms

2019-10-24 Thread Pietro Delugas
Dear Laurent It might be that the  fixed-position acts only at the "engine"  level inside pw, the forces are then are sent to the path level and there the longitudinal component  is changed accordingly to the neb algorithm you are using,  if the neb part of the program is unaware of the fixed

[QE-users] NEB calculation issue with 'fixed' atoms

2019-10-21 Thread Laurent Pizzagalli
Dear all, I encountered a weird and unexpected behavior when running a NEB calculation with QE. In this calculation, several (boundary) atoms are fixed. All initial images were provided in the input file, with the required flags "1 1 1" for mobile and "0 0 0" for fixed atoms. However, during