[QE-users] P=********** in the output directory of quantum espresso users.

2020-06-20 Thread BENYAHIA NEZHA
Dear QE users, Fisrt of all thank you so much for your help. i think that Mr Hari Paudyal was so right for the Ecut, because when i changed it to 80Ry the pressure gives a lower value. i 've used also the vc-relax instead of relax. the calculation are running and i'am waiting for the results.

Re: [QE-users] P=********** in the output directory of quantum espresso users.

2020-06-19 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 5:00 PM Vahid Askarpour wrote: > The pressure is too large, which is why it is printed as stars. > > You are only relaxing the atoms not the lattice constants. Is there a > reason why you are not using vc-relax? > if the pressure is so large that it doesn't fit in the for

Re: [QE-users] P=********** in the output directory of quantum espresso users.

2020-06-19 Thread Vahid Askarpour
The pressure is too large, which is why it is printed as stars. You are only relaxing the atoms not the lattice constants. Is there a reason why you are not using vc-relax? Cheers, Vahid Vahid Askarpour Department of physics and atmospheric science Dalhousie University Halifax, NS Canada > On

Re: [QE-users] P=********** in the output directory of quantum espresso users.

2020-06-19 Thread pboulet
Hello, That is due to the calculation you set in your input file: ‘relax’ relaxes only the atomic positions, not the cell parameters. If you want to relax the cell parameters too, you have to set ‘vc-relax’. Best, Pascal Boulet — Professor in computational materials - DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY U

[QE-users] P=********** in the output directory of quantum espresso users.

2020-06-19 Thread BENYAHIA NEZHA
Dear QE users, i have created a supercell of GaN-ZnO and i've tried to optimise it using the input file attached below. however i receive in the output file a pressure of P=** and the convergence has been achieved. i used PAW pseudopotential. I would be very grateful if somebody hel