Re: [QE-users] SCF job Crashed

2019-03-14 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:32 AM Ubaid Mohd wrote: But sir in some case it works. > and in some it doesn't. So, what should I do for the this type of problems > provide input lattice vectors with more significant digits, or (better) use "ibrav" to set the correct lattice; provide input atomic

Re: [QE-users] SCF job Crashed

2019-03-14 Thread Ubaid Mohd
But sir in some case it works. So, what should I do for the this type of problems because same calculation is running without any error on my PC and it crashing on clustures. *Mohammad Ubaid* *PhD Research Scholar* *Department of Physics* *Jamia Millia Islamia University* *New Delhi - 110025*

Re: [QE-users] SCF job Crashed

2019-03-14 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
It's a frequently reported problem, due to the usage of "ibrav=0" with lattice vectors or atomic positions not exactly symmetric. ibrav=0 should not be used for systems having some symmetry. Paolo On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:58 AM Ubaid Mohd wrote: > Dear all QE users, > I am doing charge

[QE-users] SCF job Crashed

2019-03-13 Thread Ubaid Mohd
Dear all QE users, I am doing charge density difference calculation of two different layer system. After doing the scf calculation of complete system, I need to do same scf calculation for both the isolate monolayers separately keeping the size of unit cell and atomic postion of the atom same. I