Re: [QE-users] Vacancy

2019-12-17 Thread Premkumar Thirumalaisamy
Look at this review paper discussed about defect formation energy and its significance elaborately, https://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.253 On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:09 PM Timothy Willard wrote: > This isn't really a quantum espresso specific question, but are you >

Re: [QE-users] Vacancy

2019-12-17 Thread Timothy Willard
This isn't really a quantum espresso specific question, but are you looking for the formation energy of a vacancy defect? Computing that with DFT is well documented, there is an archive paper that discusses that: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.06609. Good luck. On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 6:23 AM Pooja

[QE-users] Vacancy

2019-12-17 Thread Pooja Vyas
How to compute energy by creating vacancy in crystal? ___ Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso) users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] vacancy formation energy

2019-05-10 Thread mehrdad zamzamian
It seems the problem is XC functional type. I used the PBE with non-linear core correction USPP (Fe.pbe-nd-rrkjus.UPF). In literature, electron exchange and correlation are approximated using the Perdew and Wang PW91 formulation of the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) for the

Re: [QE-users] vacancy formation energy

2019-05-09 Thread Giuseppe Mattioli
The difference is now at least reasonable. The remaining discrepancy may be due to a different computational setup used in your reference (xc functional, pseudopotentials, cutoff, ...). It is not possible to say more than this without seeing your setup and the reference setup. HTH

Re: [QE-users] vacancy formation energy

2019-05-09 Thread mehrdad zamzamian
Thanks for considering to my case I calculated the isolated Fe in a BCC crystal: E= -55.74720381 Ry again i have total energy of 64 atoms= -2860.35431865 Ry total energy of 63 atoms (removing a Fe atom)= -2804.44525448 Ry so, E(vacancy)=-2860.35431865+2804.44525448+55.74720381= -0.16186Ry=2.2 eV!

Re: [QE-users] vacancy formation energy

2019-05-09 Thread Giuseppe Mattioli
Dear Mehrdad Zamzamian Please sign always your posts to the forum with name and scientific affiliation, we appreciate it. I suppose that the error is in the calculation of the single Fe atom. You should calculate the formation energy with respect to the reference energy of a Fe atom in

[QE-users] vacancy formation energy

2019-05-08 Thread mehrdad zamzamian
with regard I want to calculate vacancy formation energy in Fe3C. I calculated the following results by using these two pp: Fe 55.84500 Fe.pbe-nd-rrkjus.UPF C 12.01070 C.pbe-rrkjus.UPF total energy of 64 atoms= -2860.35431865 Ry total energy of 63 atoms (removing a Fe atom)=