Re: [QE-users] energy due to vacancy

2020-01-09 Thread Tone Kokalj
On 2020-01-09 09:03, Pooja Vyas wrote: Equilibrium supercell is a unit cubical box. so if its 2*2*2 cell parameters, don't we need to multiply celldm by 2? It depends on the way you specify the cell, i.e.: 1. you can multiply the celldm(1) by a factor of two, but then specify CELL_PARAMETERS

Re: [QE-users] energy due to vacancy

2020-01-09 Thread Pooja Vyas
Equilibrium supercell is a unit cubical box. so if its 2*2*2 cell parameters, don't we need to multiply celldm by 2? On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 5:34 PM Laurent Pizzagalli < laurent.pizzaga...@univ-poitiers.fr> wrote: > Dear Pooja, > > you should first change the line > > "CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom)"

Re: [QE-users] energy due to vacancy

2020-01-08 Thread Matic
Dear Pooja Vyas CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom) 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 It seems you specified the cell_parameters in angstrom instead of "alat" values. If you use alat values you can still use celldm(), otherwise convert this to appropriate angstrom values. I would suggest you go

Re: [QE-users] energy due to vacancy

2020-01-08 Thread Laurent Pizzagalli
Dear Pooja, you should first change the line "CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom)" to "CELL_PARAMETERS (alat)" HTH, Laurent On 08/01/2020 12:57, Pooja Vyas wrote: Following is my input file. Since ibrav=0, I removed celldm and gave a run, but I face the following error:

[QE-users] energy due to vacancy

2020-01-08 Thread Pooja Vyas
Following is my input file. Since ibrav=0, I removed celldm and gave a run, but I face the following error: %% task # 0 from cdiaghg : error # 618 S matrix not positive definite