Re: [QE-users] hp.x - appropriate way to handle single dopant

2024-05-22 Thread Abdesalem Houari via users
Of course, I fully agree with you !Either you go with a 64 atoms cell (3.125 % doping) calculation which could take several weeks ... or just assume that the parameters obtained from 8 atoms unit cell (25% doping) are good enough and use them in the super cell. For the U parameter, it could be

Re: [QE-users] hp.x - appropriate way to handle single dopant

2024-05-22 Thread Abdul Muhaymin via users
Dear Dr. HOUARI, Thank you for your reply. I did not correct the band gap in any system. I am hoping if I apply some U parameter to Zn-3d, Co-3d and maybe to S-3p, I can capture the physics better. In this pursuit, some V parameter might also be an option. But this is not the problem I am

Re: [QE-users] hp.x - appropriate way to handle single dopant

2024-05-21 Thread Abdesalem Houari via users
Dear Abdul Muhaymen, You say that your results are fine, except the band gap ! How did you correct it in pure ZnS, before Co-doping ? The most commun way in DFT is hybrid functionals (like HSE 06), which obviously are very demanding in computational cost.  So the DFT+U (+V) could be a nice

[QE-users] hp.x - appropriate way to handle single dopant

2024-05-20 Thread Abdul Muhaymin via users
Hello all, I am investigating single TM dopant in wide band gap semiconductors such as Co in ZnS. I am using a 64 atoms supercell where I replaced one of the Zn atom with a Co atom. I tested several convergence with respect to the supercell size. My results seem fine except the band gap. Now