Re: [QE-users] pp.x calculation very slow

2021-03-24 Thread Lenz Fiedler
Dear Professor Giannozzi, I understand. Then this half an hour is consistent with my calculations and I will simply have to deal with the computation time Thanks again! Kind regards Lenz Am Mi., 24. März 2021 um 14:51 Uhr schrieb Paolo Giannozzi < p.gianno...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Mar 23,

Re: [QE-users] pp.x calculation very slow

2021-03-24 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:28 PM Lenz Fiedler wrote: So if I understand you correctly, you did something like >mpirun -np 18 pp.x -in Fe.pp.ldos.in > on the nscf data wirh 14x14x14 and got the 560 cube files in 30 minutes? > I computed only ONE cube file, I don't remember for which k-point

Re: [QE-users] pp.x calculation very slow

2021-03-23 Thread Lenz Fiedler
Dear Professor Giannozzi, So if I understand you correctly, you did something like mpirun -np 18 pp.x -in Fe.pp.ldos.in on the nscf data wirh 14x14x14 and got the 560 cube files in 30 minutes? This is what I would expect/hope for as well. I will try this and if I cannot reproduce it there might

Re: [QE-users] pp.x calculation very slow

2021-03-21 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
A LDOS calculation should take more or less the same time as the calculation of the charge density, plus reading, wroting, etc.. I just tried and it took half an hour on 18 processors (CPU cores, not GPUs) Paolo On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 5:26 PM Lenz Fiedler wrote: > Dear Professor Giannozzi, >

Re: [QE-users] pp.x calculation very slow

2021-03-17 Thread Lenz Fiedler
Dear Professor Giannozzi, Thank you so much for your answer. You are right, I did not really think about the parallelization for the initial SCF calculation, I was more puzzled by the pp.x calculation. If I understand you correctly, using something like "pp.x -nk 16" might also help speed up the

Re: [QE-users] pp.x calculation very slow

2021-03-16 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
Your supercell is small but you have a high cutoff and a large number of k-points, which makes the overall computational load quite heavy. Moreover your choice of parallelization is less than optimal: you should use both k-point and plane-wave parallelization, something like "mpirun -np 160 pw.x

[QE-users] pp.x calculation very slow

2021-03-15 Thread Lenz Fiedler
(resent because something went wrong with the header line) Hi users, I am experiencing a problem with pp.x. I want to calculate the LDOS for a 16 Fe atom supercell using a 560 value energy grid and the 3D grid given by the DFT calculation (100x100x100 grid points). I have performed the DFT