Re: [rdo-users] Error building overcloud images

2021-06-02 Thread John Fulton
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:05 AM wodel youchi wrote: > > Hello, > > I gave up on building the images, I downloaded them, then I uploaded them > into openstack, the operation seemed to work but "openstack image list" does > not return anything. > > [stack@underooo ~]$ ll images/ > total 4454988 >

Re: [rdo-users] Add a pre-installed node

2020-11-04 Thread John Fulton
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:05 AM Khodayar Doustar wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > We are trying to add a pre-installed node to our Overcloud, I've found this > guide here: > >

Re: [rdo-users] [rdo-dev] Status of RDO Trunk Ussuri on CentOS 7 and transition to CentOS 8

2020-02-21 Thread John Fulton
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:21 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:42 AM Alan Pevec wrote: >> >> > Glance was pinned in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/24257 with the >> > link to an upstream commit which maybe broke py2 at that time >> >> looking closer, this was

Re: [rdo-users] [rdo-dev] Status of RDO Trunk Ussuri on CentOS 7 and transition to CentOS 8

2020-02-20 Thread John Fulton
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:05 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso >> wrote: >>> What do you think about this plan?, is there any reason to keep CentOS 7 >>> artificially consistent and promoting at this point of the transition to >>> CentOS 8? There's a TripleO patch [1] blocked as a result. The

Re: [rdo-users] Poor Ceph Performance

2018-11-27 Thread John Fulton
ile from the undercloud node. > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > Best regards, > > Cody > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:57 AM Donny Davis wrote: > > > > > > Also how are you uploading the images? > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 20

Re: [rdo-users] Poor Ceph Performance

2018-11-26 Thread John Fulton
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:29 PM Cody wrote: > > Hello, > > My tripleO cluster is deployed with Ceph. Both Cinder and Nova use RBD > as backend. While all essential functions work, services involving > Ceph are getting very poor performance. E.g., it takes several hours > to upload an 8GB image

Re: [rdo-users] Scaling integrated Ceph cluster with post deployment customization

2018-10-23 Thread John Fulton
ual changes aren't necessary to achieve the desired configuration. John > > Thank you very much. > > Best regards, > Cody > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 8:20 AM John Fulton wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:51 PM Cody wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [rdo-users] Scaling integrated Ceph cluster with post deployment customization

2018-10-23 Thread John Fulton
g on implementation details of the tasks. E.g. ceph-ansible isn't going to remove a pool if it's not in the pools list, but you'll be on the safe side if you reassert consistently with each update as this is how both tools are tested. John > > Thank you very much. > > Best regards, > Cod

Re: [rdo-users] Scaling integrated Ceph cluster with post deployment customization

2018-10-22 Thread John Fulton
No, I don't see why it would hurt the existing settings, provided you continue to pass the CRUSH data environment files. John On Sun, Oct 21, 2018, 10:08 PM Cody wrote: > Hello folks, > > I have made some changes to a Ceph cluster initially deployed with > OpenStack using TripleO.

Re: [rdo-users] Creating CRUSH placement rules with TripleO

2018-10-15 Thread John Fulton
also add pg_num to the above per pool. Also, watch out for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638092 John > > Thank you very much and have a good weekend! > > Best regards, > Cody > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 3:33 AM John Fulton wrote: > > > > On Saturday,