On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 02:56 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.01.2013 02:51, schrieb Noel Butler:
> > On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 16:39 +0100, emilio brambilla wrote:
> >
> >> I mean a stable release with security/important patch and no new features.
> >> when you introduce a webmail in a producti
Am 27.01.2013 02:51, schrieb Noel Butler:
> On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 16:39 +0100, emilio brambilla wrote:
>
>> I mean a stable release with security/important patch and no new features.
>> when you introduce a webmail in a production environment where they
>> train users for the webmail usage, it'
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 16:39 +0100, emilio brambilla wrote:
> I mean a stable release with security/important patch and no new features.
> when you introduce a webmail in a production environment where they
> train users for the webmail usage, it's hard to change things, that's
> why I'd like a
On 26/01/2013 16:39, emilio brambilla wrote:
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
I really like it (it's a marketing issue a version 0.x when you suggest a
company to move to opensource) :-)
+1
if you move to 1.0 I think the bigger feature I'd like to have is a real
STABLE relea
Thomas Bruederli wrote:
> Hello folks
>
> We're in the final round of getting the 0.9 stable release ready and
> the question about the next major version arises. I know, our
> versioning has been very modest and therefore we're at 0.9 after more
> than 7 years of development. When starting Round
Am 26.01.2013 16:39, schrieb emilio brambilla:
> if you move to 1.0 I think the bigger feature I'd like to have is a real
> STABLE release;
> I mean a stable release with security/important patch and no new features.
> when you introduce a webmail in a production environment where they train
>
hello,
On 2013/01/26 1:19 PM, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
I really like it (it's a marketing issue a version 0.x when you suggest
a company to move to opensource) :-)
Together with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you
the opportuni
Hi there,
to my mind, roundcube is pretty feature complete.
A mobile skin, though, would be a pretty neat feature, i have to agree on that
(although one could argue that if you're on mobile you could also use your OSes
Mail-Client which would probably more convenient and more responsive than a
On 01/26/2013 07:19 AM, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
>
> Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
Yup.
> Together with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you
> the opportunity to submit your personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to
> post your top 3 must-have features you're cu
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the best open source webmail roundcube.
Here is my 3 requested feature.
1. Mobile device skin (iphone,android)
2. PGP, S/MIME encryption support
3. XMMP chat client support.
Thanks again.
On 26.01.2013 14:19, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
Hello folks
We're in the final round
On 2013-01-26 01:19 pm, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
> post your top 3 must-have features you're currently missing
+1 for a v1.0 release asap.
. multiple user accounts
. collapsible folders (using some ajax tree widget)
. an optional simpler theme with no wasted space
. an optional wide view layout [f
I'm very happy with roundcube and I'm using it exclusively for quite
a while now.
Two things could be improved a bit:
* It's not easy to
switch between the HTML and text part (For display and when replying).
I'm now using HTML mail only, everything else is not really feasible. I
woul
Thomas,
I changed from Thunderbird a few years ago and have been extremely
happy with RCM! I needed to be able to access my mail on my own server
from anywhere so I HAD to change but I was surprised about the "feature
completeness" of RCM being as good as it was. The ONLY thing I still
real
Hello folks
We're in the final round of getting the 0.9 stable release ready and
the question about the next major version arises. I know, our
versioning has been very modest and therefore we're at 0.9 after more
than 7 years of development. When starting Roundcube back in 2005, my
vision about Ro
14 matches
Mail list logo
