Re: [Scilab-users] compiling scilab

Hello all, Sorry for answering that late, I can offer more :) . The error comes from the buggy parallel OCaml compilation of the Modelica compiler. This is a known issue and I currently failed to resolve it : you should compile with `make -j1` to succeed. I was only able to reproduce it on sys

Re: [Scilab-users] compiling scilab

Hello, I can confirm that with a recent Ocaml compiler (4.04.0) on Archlinux using the PKGBUILD from the AUR (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scilab/) and with modelica activated ('--with-modelica') the build fails even with the '-j1' option. Regards, Florian On 24/03/17 09:53, Clément David

[Scilab-users] Building Scilab 6.0 with Visual Studio 2015?

Hello, Has anybody successfully build Scilab 6.0 from source for Windows 64Bit using Visual Studio 2015? If yes, does it work out-of-the-box following the instructions given here https://wiki.scilab.org/Compilation%20of%20Scilab ? Thanks, Dirk ___ use

Re: [Scilab-users] add number arrays efficiently, how?

PabloF wrote > May be im missing something, but i think in both cases you need to know > the arrays in advance, dont you? > > Also, i think SumArr = [SumArr toAdd] has better performance... > Perhaps im not understanding the question.. Perhaps merge arrays would be a appropriate subject. If I c

Re: [Scilab-users] add number arrays efficiently, how?

Erhy, Your code only works if the input arrays are oriented similiarly (both column or row vectors). For the following input your code would not run: SumArr = [ 1 2 3 ]; toAdd = [ 7 8 9 10 ]'; SumArr( (length(SumArr)+1) : (length(SumArr)+length(toAdd)) ) = toAdd; !--error 15 Submatrix incorrec

Re: [Scilab-users] {EXT} Re: add number arrays efficiently, how?

Hello, > De : Rafael Guerra > Envoyé : vendredi 24 mars 2017 13:16 > > Your code only works if the input arrays are oriented similiarly (both > column or row vectors). > [...] > > SumArr = [ 1 2 3 ]; > toAdd = [ 7 8 9 10 ]' You can transform it to line vectors (or column vectors) with matrix()

Re: [Scilab-users] {EXT} Re: add number arrays efficiently, how?

with no logic to respect the SumArr orientation the following is even simpler: [SumArr(:); toAdd(:)] Rgds, Rafael -- View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/add-number-arrays-efficiently-how-tp4035946p4035978.html Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailin

Re: [Scilab-users] mixed data type matrix

Dear All Thanks for your helpful answers. I could solve the problem. Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/mixed-data-type-matrix-tp4035956p4035979.html Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Scilab-users] Reading numerical and string vectors from txt-file

mgetl(filename) is a good alternative. I have used it in a function because retrieving numbers comes up frequently for me. function cv=!cv(fp,colspan,varargin)//Extracts a numeric Colum Vector from ASCII file //Data separator in file: spaces only, number may differ from line to line to co

[Scilab-users] 3D interpolation

Hi all, I don't know if my question is relavante (or not), but I'm wondering what is the best way to perform a 3D interpolation, from for the matrix definition to the interpolation procedure. Let me using a basic example: I've some curves y = f(x,T) defining a material behaviour at different temp

Re: [Scilab-users] 3D interpolation

Hello ! Did you try cshep2d + eval_cshep2d ? HTH Denis [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] Unité Mixte de Physique CNRS / THALES 1 Avenue Augustin Fresnel 91767 Palaiseau CEDEx - France Tel : +33 (0)1 69 41 58 52 Fax : +33 (0)1 69 41 58 78 e-mail : denis.cr...@thalesgroup.com

Re: [Scilab-users] 3D interpolation

I'm not an expert.  But: I did a quick spin through the help files and came up with splin2d and interp2d.  It looks like what you want -- get the splines in x and T using splin2d, and find the y values for a given x and T using interp2d. I don't know if this is the very best way to do this mathem

Re: [Scilab-users] 3D interpolation

That doesn't show up in the help for 5.5.2.  Is it a 6.x thing, or is there a toolbox?  Looks interesting, at any rate. On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 18:45 +0100, CRETE Denis wrote: > Hello ! > Did you try cshep2d + eval_cshep2d ? > HTH > Denis >   > [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] >   > Unité Mixte de Phys

Re: [Scilab-users] {EXT} Some weirdies with 6.0.0

Hello, > De : Dang Ngoc Chan, Christophe > Envoyé : mardi 21 mars 2017 10:19 > > E.g. I has two graphical windows opened and one of them did not I investigated this a bit and found a reproducible minimal case, see bug 15100 http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Regards -- Christophe

[Scilab-users] add value to each element of an array, also to an empty one

Hello! Again a basic question. e.g. A = [ 1 2 3 ]; I = find( A > 10); if length(I) > 0 then I = I + 1; end Is there a alternative *without the if ?* I miss the .+ operator. Thank you -- View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/add-value-to-each-element-of-an-ar

Re: [Scilab-users] add value to each element of an array, also to an empty one

Hello Erhy, Le 24/03/2017 à 20:36, Erhy a écrit : Hello! Again a basic question. e.g. A = [ 1 2 3 ]; I = find( A > 10); if length(I) > 0 then I = I + 1; end Is there a alternative *without the if ?* Yes, just: I = I + 1 The if is useless: 1. length(I)==0 means I==[] and then I+1 ==

Re: [Scilab-users] add value to each element of an array, also to an empty one

Samuel GOUGEON wrote > 1. length(I)==0 means I==[] and then I+1 == []+1 ==[] as if nothing But in my examples I = []; Iplus = I + 1; then Iplus is 1 -- View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/add-value-to-each-element-of-an-array-also-to-an-empty-one-tp4035989p4035991.h

Re: [Scilab-users] add value to each element of an array, also to an empty one

Le 24/03/2017 à 21:08, Erhy a écrit : Samuel GOUGEON wrote 1. length(I)==0 means I==[] and then I+1 == []+1 ==[] as if nothing But in my examples I = []; Iplus = I + 1; then Iplus is 1 Not in Scilab 6, for the time being. I assumed that you were using Scilab 6. In Scilab 5: i know nothing s

Re: [Scilab-users] add value to each element of an array, also to an empty one

Samuel GOUGEON wrote > Not in Scilab 6, for the time being. I assumed that you were using Scilab > 6. so I will jump to version 6 Thank you! -- View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/add-value-to-each-element-of-an-array-also-to-an-empty-one-tp4035989p4035993.html Sent f

Re: [Scilab-users] 3D interpolation

Le 24/03/2017 à 18:40, paul.carr...@free.fr a écrit : Hi all, I don't know if my question is relavante (or not), but I'm wondering what is the best way to perform a 3D interpolation, from for the matrix definition to the interpolation procedure. Let me using a basic example: I've some curves

Re: [Scilab-users] 3D interpolation

thanks all for the answers; I didn't know about ndgrid and I'm currently having a look on it (seems to be quite interesting) Samuel: from your example and the help doc, I need to understand how to proceed to perform linear interpolations (temperatures and abscissa's in my example) Paul Le 201

Re: [Scilab-users] add value to each element of an array, also to an empty one

An ugly alternative without find and without the if as requested: A = [ -1 2 7 ]; I = (A>10).*(cumsum(ones(A))+1); I(I==0) = [] I = [] I = (A>0).*(cumsum(ones(A))+1); I(I==0) = [] I = 3.4. Rgds, Rafael -- View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/add-valu

[Scilab-users] efficient calculation for a moving window

Suppose x is a 1*n　vector and mhttp://mailinglists.scilab.org/efficient-calculation-for-a-moving-window-tp4035997.html Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org h