Hi Samuel,
Thanks for your details explanation.
The microdaq 1.2 seems to be listed, does it means that it has been
manually added ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Chin Luh
On 4/1/2018 8:54 AM, Samuel Gougeon wrote:
Hello,
After this fix https://codereview.scilab.org/#/c/19273/ and up to the
break of
Hello,
After this fix https://codereview.scilab.org/#/c/19273/ and up to the
break of ATOMS at the end of July 2017, the whole ATOMS system on both
server and client GUI sides behaved exactly as expected (for the first
time since ATOMS exists): any online modification of a module on the
serve
Thanks for your comments, Rafael.
I am answering in the body:
Le 03/01/2018 à 16:00, Rafael Guerra a écrit :
Samuel,
As requested, some further feedback on circshift:
* The proposed syntax seems to be compatible with Matlab’s circshift
while adding extra functionality, which is very pos
Samuel,
As requested, some further feedback on circshift:
* The proposed syntax seems to be compatible with Matlab’s circshift while
adding extra functionality, which is very positive
* To add to the wish list: if the input matrix represents a regularly
sampled function, it would be
Hello Antoine,
Thanks for your time to have read this proposal and comment it.
I am afraid i don't catch your first point. As far as i understand your
suggestion, the last existing example with an hypermatrix of texts
already fulfills it.
For my part, in examples, i think it is better to show
Hi Samuel,
Thanks a lot for this nice SEP.
I have a couple of comments:
1) I think I should be good to also show some multidimensional examples
using "shifts" and using both "shifts" and "dims". Sometimes in the
scilab documentation, the user is served with examples only covering the
most ba
