Hello all,
Le 06/12/2019 à 23:37, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
Le 06/12/2019 à 23:23, Federico Miyara a écrit :
.../...
By the way, if constant were changed to double (or to number or
num.ber --I don't get the dot...
As in 3.14, contrarily to 123
If "double" is not to be used for reasons that I still don't understand,
why don't we use "Real" instead of "Number" for x such that
typeof(x)==constant and isreal(x)==%t ? This would be consistent with
"complex" when typeof(x)==constant and isreal(x)==f. Moreover, this
would be even set-theory compliant, i.e. use the name of the smallest
set corresponding to storage type.
--), then as this might cause some backward compatibility, consider
taking the oportunity also to replace "ce" by "cell", and "st" by
"struct",
Definitely, or even with their possible translation in locales, as for
other main native types.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/1/c3RlcGhhbmUubW90dGVsZXRAdXRjLmZy/lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Stéphane Mottelet
Ingénieur de recherche
EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable
Département Génie des Procédés Industriels
Sorbonne Universités - Université de Technologie de Compiègne
CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne cedex
Tel : +33(0)344234688
http://www.utc.fr/~mottelet
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
