Pierre,
Thanks for your answer.
However, I believe no involved computatins are required to get the
correct result. The multiplication of the two polynomials from the
denominators is straightforward, no need to solve any system, no risk of
ill-conditioned or badly-scaled matrices.
This must
Hello,
Following a private discussion with Samuel, I submitted a bug report on a
memory leak in Matplot(): http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16377
Cheers,
Antoine
Le Mardi, Mars 17, 2020 15:28 CET, "Antoine Monmayrant" a
écrit:
> Hi all,
>
> I know that it's usually bad prac
Hi all,
I know that it's usually bad practice to duplicate an already existing bug.
But it's also good practice to make one report per specific bug.
I've just waisted two days on a nasty memory leak when plotting/clearing a
graph in a loop (50 iterations were enough to kill scilab).
Looking at re
Here are examples of my process in Open loop (FTBO) or Close loop (FTBF)
Depending of managemat, D can have s14 …
De : Perrichon
Envoyé : mardi 17 mars 2020 10:49
À : 'Users mailing list for Scilab'
Objet : RE: [Scilab-users] Strange behaviour of prod on rationals
Hello Federico
Hello Federico
I have met few months or years ago this problem when i was developping my «
OPTSIM Solution » software to fix parameters of a PID for turbines (30 mw to 2
gw) in Nyquist and Bode Plans with hydraulic parameters site
So I’ve seen instability of the denominator, witch damage ca
Dear all,
Look at this code (the coefficients are actually the result of pevious
calculations):
NUM = [5.858D-09 + 2.011D-08*%s + 4.884D-08*%s^2 ...
5.858D-09 + 8.796D-10*%s + 7.028D-10*%s^2]
DEN = [0.1199597 + 7.2765093*%s + %s^2 ...
8.336136 + 7.0282601*%s + %s^2]
q = NUM./DEN
Runni
