Re: [Scilab-users] Nysquist instruction - fmin fmax parameters vectorized controlling

2019-11-01 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
Sincerely Pierre       > Message du 31/10/19 18:53 > De : "Samuel Gougeon" > A : users@lists.scilab.org > Copie à : > Objet : Re: [Scilab-users] Nysquist instruction - fmin fmax parameters > vectorized controlling > > Le 31/10/2019 à 18:34, Pierre PERRICHON a

Re: [Scilab-users] CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
  Dear,   A new time, Federico is right. Monsieur Pierre-Simon de Lapalce is a French man ==> so the variable of Laplace is p American are not France, so they use s Like Grafcet in FRANCE, which is a french conception and SFC in US and their copies several years later.   I've done my own

[Scilab-users] Nysquist instruction - fmin fmax parameters vectorized controlling

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
Dear all, As said in the nyquist help instruction, it is possible to get a nyquist plan using this instruction nyquist( sl,[fmin,fmax] [,step] [,comments] [,symmetry]) ... and this example in the same doc : nyquist([Plant;Plant*PID],0.5,100,["Plant";"Plant and PID corrector"]); Here, we see t

Re: [Scilab-users] k*Ts - tr: Re: CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
: users@lists.scilab.org > Copie à : > Objet : Re: [Scilab-users] k*Ts - tr: Re: CLR design component is not clear > in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10 > > Le 31/10/2019 à 15:29, Pierre PERRICHON a écrit : > >  Dear Samuel, > > if we > replace Ts by k*Ts, what does it give? (we hope

[Scilab-users] k*Ts - tr: Re: CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
  Dear Samuel, if we replace Ts by k*Ts, what does it give? (we hope the same symbol than for .s Sincerely       > Message du 31/10/19 15:11 > De : "Pierre PERRICHON" > A : "UsersmailinglistforScilab" > Copie à : > Objet : tr: Re: [Scilab-users] C

[Scilab-users] tr: Re: CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
! That's professional and the better I've never seen !     Regards > Message du 31/10/19 10:57 > De : "Pierre PERRICHON" > A : "UsersmailinglistforScilab" > Copie à : > Objet : Re: [Scilab-users] CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2

[Scilab-users] Basic test Bode - Nyquist failed scilab 6.0.2

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
Hello   BUG DESCRIPTION: When entering "bode" then immediatly nyquist at the console, we get error at nyquist execution. ERROR LOG: -- Initialisation : Chargement de l'environnement de travail --> bode --> nyquist à la ligne 162 de la fonction nyquist ( C:\Program F

Re: [Scilab-users] CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
  Dear all, dear Samuel,   Many thanks for your gallery For me the better d       > Message du 31/10/19 00:16 > De : "Samuel Gougeon" > A : users@lists.scilab.org > Copie à : > Objet : Re: [Scilab-users] CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 > x64 W10 > > Le 30/10/2019 à 2