Re: [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? ?= GUI hel

2019-11-28 Thread Antoine Monmayrant
Le Jeudi, Novembre 28, 2019 17:05 CET, Claus Futtrup a écrit: > Hi Antoine, et al. > > Your reply is very helpful, so I think you got the right question :-) > > 1) Good point that I can use callback on every uicontrol. This would be > suitable for a simple example (like gui_example.sce) ...

Re: [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? ?= GUI hel

2019-11-29 Thread Antoine Monmayrant
Le Jeudi, Novembre 28, 2019 19:40 CET, Claus Futtrup a écrit: > Hi Antoine > > Also, you should better use get(a, 'propertyName') or set(a, 'propertyName', > value) instead of a.propertyName and a.propertyName=value in your callbacks. > > > I see what you mean. I just now had trouble turni

Re: [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? ?= GUI hel

2019-11-29 Thread Antoine Monmayrant
Le Jeudi, Novembre 28, 2019 20:55 CET, Samuel Gougeon a écrit: > Le 28/11/2019 à 17:47, Antoine Monmayrant a écrit : > > .../... > > Also, you should better use get(a, 'propertyName') or set(a, > > 'propertyName', value) instead of a.propertyName and a.propertyName=value > > in your callback

Re: [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? ?= GUI hel

2019-11-29 Thread Antoine Monmayrant
> get() and set() can now use a tagsPath, that might be less ambiguate > than using findobj(), that returns the first component with a matching > tag (unless only unique tags are defined). The documentation of set() is > being overhauled . You >

Re: [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? ?= GUI hel

2019-11-29 Thread Antoine Monmayrant
> > 4) I will also look into this. My problem is the steep learning curve. > > If you look at the Scilab tutorials you have the good-old Openeering > > LHY_Tutorial - it's incredibly complicated and long. Is LHY_Tutorial > > using the Model-Viewer-Controller approach? - Maybe the > > Model-View

Re: [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? ?= GUI hel

2019-11-29 Thread Antoine Monmayrant
Le Vendredi, Novembre 29, 2019 19:27 CET, Claus Futtrup a écrit: > Hi Antoine, et al - anybody feel free to chime in. > > I see the below example uses f=figure() ... instead of f=scf(). > > What's the reason for this preference? No particular reason, I just use either scf() or figure(). I t