Re: [Scilab-users] Booeleans : irrelevant results ?

2015-08-27 Thread Pierre Vuillemin
Dear Paul, The behaviour of test 2 may come from the order in which the operations are performed : Note that (a & c & b) ~= (b & c & a), indeed : - a & c & b performs a & c which returns [] and then [] & b which returns [], - b & c & a performs b & c which returns %t and then %t & [] whi

Re: [Scilab-users] Booeleans : irrelevant results ?

2015-08-27 Thread Carrico, Paul
...@pierre-vuillemin.fr] Envoyé : jeudi 27 août 2015 13:08 À : Users mailing list for Scilab Cc : Carrico, Paul Objet : Re: [Scilab-users] Booeleans : irrelevant results ? Dear Paul, The behaviour of test 2 may come from the order in which the operations are performed : Note that (a & c

[Scilab-users] Booeleans : irrelevant results ?

2015-08-27 Thread Carrico, Paul
Dear All, I wondering what I'm doing wrong in the examples here bellow: - Test 1 --> M returns False that's ok for me - Test 2 --> should return False as well, shouldn't be ? - Test 3 --> another test using directly a Boolean instead of an empty form [] - T