Hi Tim
Thank you for the hint. I actually do totally agree to your suggestion that
this is not very good style. I thought, that since I will most probably
never use the function beta in this particular project I could risk this
kind of usage. However, I will try to avoid redefining built-in functi
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 02:31 -0700, DominicErnst wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I stumbled across a strange behavior I don't understand correctly.
> Please also refer to the simplified code extract below.
>
> Apparently beta(x,y) refers to a built in SciLab function (beta function
> (Euler integral of the
Hi Samuel
Thanks for your reply. That's what I thought, but as a beginner I'm always
careful saying 'This is a bug', as I am not always sure I got everything
right. Using Beta instead of beta is a good idea. Thanks a lot.
Best,
Dominic
-
--
Dominic Ernst
CNC-PLC Software Developer @ Bys
Hello Dominic,
Le 22/06/2015 11:31, DominicErnst a écrit :
.../...
Now, if I try to write-access a particular value in this now initialized
vector I get the Warning "Warning: obsolete use of '=' instead of '=='.".
It looks like a bug.
After the beta=zeros(1:10)'; overwriting assignment, funptr(
Dear all,
I stumbled across a strange behavior I don't understand correctly.
Please also refer to the simplified code extract below.
Apparently beta(x,y) refers to a built in SciLab function (beta function
(Euler integral of the first kind)). If I redefine the function by a simple
vector variable
