[Scilab-users] Variable user equation input (2, 3 or more)

2022-04-29 Thread Lester Anderson
Hello all, I have a simple code which computes applies the Chinese Remainder theorem (for a single variable) given three input congruence equations to solve for x; not very elegant but it works: My query, is it possible to make this more generalised and vary the number of input equations and give

Re: [Scilab-users] Variable user equation input (2, 3 or more)

2022-04-30 Thread Lester Anderson
Cleaned up the code using Loops clear // Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) for 3 congruence equations// e.g. x ≡ 3 mod 5; x ≡ 1 mod 7; x ≡ 6 mod 8// result ≡ 78 mod 280 m=evstr(x_dialog(['Moduli values: '],'1'));a=evstr(x_dialog(['Remainder values: '],'1'));m1=m(1); m2=m(2); m3=m(3);a1=a(1); a2=a(2)

Re: [Scilab-users] Variable user equation input (2, 3 or more)

2022-04-30 Thread Lester Anderson
Sorted the code with multiple equations. Not too sure how to deal with the messagebox list of equations. Still have to do that manually - unless there is a way to automatically build this? Can this multiple text string be done via a for loop to build a list ? Thanks __

Re: [Scilab-users] Variable user equation input (2, 3 or more)

2022-05-01 Thread Lester Anderson
Having an issue with the code: Tried: x ≡ 2 mod 11; 3 mod 12; 4 mod 13; 5 mod 17; 6 mod 19 (result should be 150999 but get 442719) Also checked x ≡ 4 mod 11; 3 mod 17 (result should be 37 but get 136) However, 3 equations work fine! I have pinned down the problem to M_inv, where it is not loopin

Re: [Scilab-users] Variable user equation input (2, 3 or more)

2022-05-01 Thread Lester Anderson
As a test, I increased the value n (iterations) and that forced it to converge on the value 150999. Sounds like I need a test of convergence. On Sun, 1 May 2022 at 08:37, Lester Anderson wrote: > Having an issue with the code: > > Tried: x ≡ 2 mod 11; 3 mod 12; 4 mod 13; 5 mod 17; 6 mod 19 (res

Re: [Scilab-users] Variable user equation input (2, 3 or more)

2022-05-02 Thread Dang Ngoc Chan, Christophe
Hello, > De : De la part de Lester Anderson > Envoyé : samedi 30 avril 2022 07:15 > > My query, is it possible to make this more generalised and vary the > number of input equations and give the user an option to specify the number > of equations? I don't know this problem and its solution but a