Re: [strongSwan] Transport mode for Windows Vista/7 RoadWarriors?

2011-10-05 Thread Ariel
The built-in Windows VPN client uses IKEv1 (strongSwan attempts to use IKEv2 by default), so add: keyexchange=ikev1 to your options and you should now see it being caught in your pluto.log (pluto is the IKEv1 daemon, charon is for IKEv2). -a On Oct 4, 2011, at 5:13 PM, Tristan Ball wrote: >

Re: [strongSwan] Charon doesn't set the routes

2011-10-05 Thread Diego Woitasen
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Tobias Brunner wrote: > Hi Diego, > >>> >>> >>> >> I forgot to clarify that route is inserted if compress=no. In >> kernel_netlink_ipsec.c add_policy methed, the code checks if mode != >> MODE_TRANSPORT to insert to route. > > Yes, if IPComp is e

Re: [strongSwan] Transport mode for Windows Vista/7 RoadWarriors?

2011-10-05 Thread Tristan Ball
Thanks Ariel. With that tip and a little more fiddling, I've gotten it to work. However I'm now stuck behind the issue that I can't have more than one client behind a single NAT firewall. Google and the mailing list archives seem to say that this is a known issue with no current publicly avail

Re: [strongSwan] Transport mode for Windows Vista/7 RoadWarriors?

2011-10-05 Thread Andreas Steffen
Hello Tristan, The Windows 7 Agile VPN client has great IKEv2 support which allows the installation of a virtual IP via the IKEv2 configuration payload. Please have a look at our Win7 <-> strongSwan HOWTO: http://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/Windows7 Kind regards Andreas On 10/

Re: [strongSwan] Transport mode for Windows Vista/7 RoadWarriors?

2011-10-05 Thread Tristan Ball
Thanks Andreas. Yes, I saw that - and I'll probably use that functionality for a separate set of requirements. Unfortunately for this particular instance, the customer has decreed "No VPNs" - I think partly for support reasons within their own organisation. Which is why I was hoping to use the