On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:55:46PM +0100, Jan Palus wrote:
> With kernel-netlink however I can achieve higher throughput with less
> CPU being used, but in that case SNAT seems to fail sometimes
> (connections are initiated correctly but "hang" after a while). Main
> difference is the lack of dedic
Hi,
May I append a piece of log to my previous message :
Dec 17 00:37:42 09[IKE] <19> remote host is behind NAT
Dec 17 00:37:42 09[ENC] <19> generating IKE_SA_INIT response 0 [ SA KE
No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP) N(MULT_AUTH) ]
Dec 17 00:37:42 09[NET] <19> sending packet: from 1.1.1.1[500] to
2.2.2
