Re: [strongSwan] Help with IKEv1 Site-to-site PSK IPv4

Hi, First, I want to thank you Noel for your help and patience. I know some of my questions are probably dumb but though not an excuse, the sheer amount of information to process is huge and intimidating (especially when discovering graphics like this

Re: [strongSwan] High latency (satellite) link : what can we improve ?

Thank you Tom, Seeing your first answer, I also had this kind of memory, but I was unable to find it as well. I'll set this and try it out !     Hoggins! Le 25/10/2017 à 12:43, Tom Rymes a écrit : > I would recommend that you try auto=route. My experience suggests that it > significantly

Re: [strongSwan] High latency (satellite) link : what can we improve ?

I would recommend that you try auto=route. My experience suggests that it significantly improves the re-establishment of tunnels if they drop due to bad links. I think that the documentation also recommends this, but I can't seem to find that right now. Tom > On Oct 25, 2017, at 4:41 AM,

Re: [strongSwan] High latency (satellite) link : what can we improve ?

Le 24/10/2017 à 18:52, Tom Rymes a écrit : > On Oct 24, 2017, at 11:53 AM, Hoggins! wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We sometimes use a satellite link for one of our site2sites tunnels, and >> there are times when the tunnel simply stops working. Maybe we don't >> wait enough for it to