Hi Jafar, Peer is also using strongswan 5.3.3. following is the
configuration. We need tunnel because once it is connected in LAN we
want to implement in WAN/Internet. Output of the 192.168.10.40 is bellow.
Config setup
charondebug="all"
uniqueids=yes
On 2/7/2018 9:22 AM, Sujoy wrote:
Thanks Jafar, for the reply. But after removing subnet from the config
also tunneling failed. Is there any issue with the version of
strongswan 5.3.3. What means "TS_UNACCEPTABLE notify, no CHILD_SA built"
"TS_UNACCEPTABLE notify" means the peer didn't
Thanks Jafar, for the reply. But after removing subnet from the config
also tunneling failed. Is there any issue with the version of strongswan
5.3.3. What means "TS_UNACCEPTABLE notify, no CHILD_SA built"
Config setup
charondebug="all"
uniqueids=yes
On 2/7/2018 9:01 AM, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh wrote:
You can have the least significant octet set to zero with a 32-bit netmask
Sorry, this should read:
You can NOT have the least significant octet set to zero with a 32-bit
netmask
Sujoy,
Are you sure about
rightsubnet=192.168.10.0/32
This subnet gets you nothing unless you know that it has a special
meaning in the config that I'm not aware of. You can have the least
significant octet set to zero with a 32-bit netmask. What is the
rightsubnet that you are trying
