Re: [strongSwan] Missing NAT keep alive packets when forceencaps is set

2019-04-23 Thread Tobias Brunner
Hi Lars, > Got a roadwarrior/client connection where NAT-T isn't auto detected. Why is that? > I tried to solve this by forcing UDP encapsulation using forceencaps=yes and > expected that NAT keep alive packets also where sent in order to keep the > connection alive. > But this doesn't seem to

[strongSwan] Missing NAT keep alive packets when forceencaps is set

2019-04-23 Thread Lars Alex Pedersen
Got a roadwarrior/client connection where NAT-T isn't auto detected. I tried to solve this by forcing UDP encapsulation using forceencaps=yes and expected that NAT keep alive packets also where sent in order to keep the connection alive. But this doesn't seem to be the case. Can I enable this

[strongSwan] Can't connect to VPN server with StrongSwan

2019-04-23 Thread sIiiS .
Hi all I hope someone help me to solve this issue! This is my log error initiating Main Mode IKE_SA mytunnel[2] to vpn-server-ip generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ] sending packet: from my-server-ip[500] to vpn-server-ip[500] (180 bytes) received packet: from vpn-server-ip[500] to