[strongSwan] Can't connect to VPN after upgrading from 5.7.2 to 5.8.2

2020-04-06 Thread Philipp Trulson
Hey everyone, I hope everyone is well and thanks for reading :) At work we are running an IPSec/IKEv2 VPN that worked fine with Fedora 31 / strongswan 5.7.2 until the maintainers pushed the update to strongswan 5.8.2. Since then I am unable to establish a connection and I don't really understa

Re: [strongSwan] Can't connect to VPN after upgrading from 5.7.2 to 5.8.2

2020-04-06 Thread Tobias Brunner
Hi Philipp, > Apr 06 16:14:54 linux.fritz.box charon-nm[2251]: 03[IKE] no acceptable > traffic selectors found > Apr 06 16:14:54 linux.fritz.box charon-nm[2251]: 03[IKE] failed to > establish CHILD_SA, keeping IKE_SA > > However the "selected proposal:" line didn't change and I was unable to >

Re: [strongSwan] Can't connect to VPN after upgrading from 5.7.2 to 5.8.2

2020-04-06 Thread Philipp Trulson
Hi Tobias, thanks for the quick reply! I increased the log level for cfg to 4, but I still don't see a problem (aka "error") in the logs: Apr 06 18:07:49 linux.fritz.box charon-nm[2186]: 14[CFG] selecting proposal: Apr 06 18:07:49 linux.fritz.box charon-nm[2186]: 14[CFG] proposal matches Apr 0

Re: [strongSwan] Can't connect to VPN after upgrading from 5.7.2 to 5.8.2

2020-04-06 Thread Tobias Brunner
Hi Philipp, > thanks for the quick reply! I increased the log level for cfg to 4, but > I still don't see a problem (aka "error") in the logs: Looks like you forgot to check the "Request an inner IP address" box. Regards, Tobias

Re: [strongSwan] Can't connect to VPN after upgrading from 5.7.2 to 5.8.2

2020-04-06 Thread Philipp Trulson
Hi Tobias, indeed, that solved the problem. Interesting that this wasn't necessary earlier or on Android. Anyway, thank you! Best, Philipp Am 06.04.20 um 18:34 schrieb Tobias Brunner: Hi Philipp, thanks for the quick reply! I increased the log level for cfg to 4, but I still don't see a p

[strongSwan] vici initiator only or responder per connection

2020-04-06 Thread Naveen Neelakanta
Hi All, I am using the vici plugin to configure strongswan and load and initiate connection . I see that we have a global " *initiator_only = yes/no* " configuration in charon.conf, is it possible to configure this for per connection via vici, so that the initiator is only responsible for initiati

[strongSwan] received retransmit of response with ID 0, but next request already sent

2020-04-06 Thread Matt Wright
I've been trying to make a connection between my home PC and the Watchguard XTM330 we have at the office. I'll fully admit that I know enough about all of this to be dangerous, and have muddled my way through things, as best I can, so the connection atleast appears to be trying to connect how