address it sends a logout from to the existing connection?
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
[Description: Description: Description:
hme_scrn_ind_new_notification_Precsn_Zen_801421_11]<http://www.blackberry.com/>
-
This transm
306 proto 50
ACCEPT all -- 10.244.134.220.0.0.0/0policy match dir
in pol ipsec reqid 305 proto 50
ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/010.244.134.22policy match dir
out pol ipsec reqid 305 proto 50
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN
Any update on why this is happening?
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing - R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cel: (647) 289-261-5801
Email amilano...@blackberry.com<mailto:amilano...@blackberry.com>
[Description: Description: cid:image001.gif@01CDFFB
HI Pavel,
That worked thank you
Tunnel was established and ESP packets were arriving at the GW when I looked at
the tcpdump but don't know what was happening to the packet eventually found
the sequence was off.
Thanks :)
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiF
Hi all,
I am trying to debug why I can ping resources in my intranet and it works and
then its stops working yet tunnel stays established?
Is there a way to see if the GW is decrypting my ESP packet and to try and
trace where it is going?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab
HI list,
I have 300+ entries in my iptables -L and restarting strongswan doesn't clear
them and it is a production GW that I cannot simple restart. How can I resolve
this? And why is it happening so I can resolve it for the future?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Adrian Milanosk
doesn't do a single thing with it.
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing – R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cel: (647) 289-261-5801
Email amilano...@blackberry.com
-Original Message-----
From: Adrian Milanoski
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 201
Does any know what this error code means?
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing - R&D
4715 Tahoe Blvd, Mississauga, ON, Canada, L4W 0B5
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Fax.(905) 629-7836
Email amilano...@blackberry.com<mailto:amilano...@blackbe
th 32, who has fc00::11d7:8059:b4fd:122c
^C64 packets captured
101 packets received by filter
7 packets dropped by kernel
My router is receiving the ICMPv6 solicitation packet why doesn't it respond?
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing – R&D
Tel
ICMP6, echo request, seq 10, length 16
18:38:07.048801 IP6 fc00::1 > ff02::1:ff02:2: ICMP6, neighbor solicitation, who
has fc00::2:2, length 32
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing – R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cel: (647) 289-261-5801
Email amilano...@b
ed by strongSwan?
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFi VPN Security Testing. - R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cel: (647)289-6995
Email: amilano...@blackberry.com
Berried into cloud 10 da next level!l!..
Original Message
From: Noel Kuntze
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 12:07 PM
T
seq=0xe0), length 100
Is there something else that needs to be set in the kernel for IPv6 to properly
forward and route traffic?
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing – R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cel: (647) 289-261-5801
Email amilano...@blackberry
HI,
Changed forwarding to 1 on all interfaces now.
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing – R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cel: (647) 289-261-5801
Email amilano...@blackberry.com
rightsourceip=fc00::2:0/64
Subnet on the private side is
FCc00::/64
Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing – R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cel: (647) 289-261-5801
Email amilano...@blackberry.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Willi [mailto:mar...@strongswan.org]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 4:15 AM
To: Adrian Milanoski
Cc: U
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the response. Simplifying the subnet was not an option unfortunately
as customers are requesting this.
Appreciate your prompt response either way as always. :)
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing – R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 |
trying to ping FC00::2 and see nothing. Can someone please shed some light
on this grim situation for me? Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing - R&D
4715 Tahoe Blvd, Mississauga, ON, Canada, L4W 0B5
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Fax.(905) 629-
nyone comment on this limitation? Is this a bug?
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing - R&D
4715 Tahoe Blvd, Mississauga, ON, Canada, L4W 0B5
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Fax.(905) 629-7836
Email amilano...@blackberry.com<mailto:amilano...@blackberry.com>
Perfect thanks Tobias
I will try and upgrade my current version to the latest one
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing – R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cel: (647) 289-261-5801
Email amilano...@blackberry.com
-Original Message-
From: To
Thank you Martin
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing – R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cel: (647) 289-261-5801
Email amilano...@blackberry.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Willi [mailto:mar...@strongswan.org]
Sent: Wednesday, Novembe
Hello StrongSwan users,
A colleague of mine is wondering if it is possible to do the following. See
below.
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing - R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cel: (647) 289-261-5801
Email amilano...@blackberry.com<mailto:
HI all,
Is it possible to setup ipsec.secrets to allow only certain subnets to use
certain PSKs
24.177.*.* : PSK "tempskforme"
Is this at all possible? How can I control which subnets are allowed to access
my GW?
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Securi
done.
"CN=* OU=Marketing O=BlackBerry S=ON C=CA EMAIL=*@srpvpn.net"
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing – R&D
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cel: (647) 289-261-5801
Email amilano...@blackberry.com
-Original Message-
From:
net>
Passes
conn ikev2_pki_GW_EMAIL_CL_EMAIL
leftcert=ss3ecgdsadev.srpvpn.netcert.pem
leftid=bboslabad...@srpvpn.net
rightid=us...@srpvpn.net<mailto:rightid=us...@srpvpn.net>
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing - R&D
HI all,
Can anyone provide me any information on if strongSwan currently support the
following RFC or not?
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN. Security Testing - R&D
Research In Motion Limited
[Description: Description: Description:
www.rim.com]<http://www.
routed out my public interface and
they are not NAT'd.
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS WiFI VPN Dev. Security Testing
Research In Motion Limited
Tel.(289) 261-5801 | Cell: 647-289-6995
Email amilano...@rim.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Willi [mailt
Yeah I am running v5.0 and the leftnexthop has been removed. :(
I am looking into setting some static routing on my updown script that can be
run each time or have a permanent route in place for all my virtual ip address
as they arrive.
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS
nly 1 default GW on my GW and that is for the
public. I do not have a GW set for my private network.
I am trying to get it so that any packets that come from 172.16.24.x go back
out to the private interface or to the default GW for that matter.
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Lab Administrator
BBOS
.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
BBOS Lab Administrator
VPN / WLAN IOT / Pre-Cert
Research In Motion Limited
4715 Tahoe Blvd, Mississauga,
ON, Canada, L4W 0B5
Tel.(289) 261-5801|Fax (905) 629-7836
Email amilano...@rim.com<mailto:amilano...@rim.com>
[Descr
Was anyone able to figure out why this is not working for me?
-
A
From: users-bounces+amilanoski=rim@lists.strongswan.org
[mailto:users-bounces+amilanoski=rim@lists.strongswan.org] On Behalf Of
Adrian Milanoski
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 1:03 PM
To: SaRaVanAn; Martin Willi
Cc
HI all,
I currently have 2 strongSwans in my environment and one is currently
authenticating and 1 is not.
I have cloned the configurations to the 'T' and yet still once allow
authentication to pass. The one that is passing authentication is only passing
authentication with 1 username, but w
private
network. Do you see similar symptoms?
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Short Range Protocols
Lab Administrator
Research In Motion Limited
Tel.(289) 261-5801
Email amilano...@rim.com<mailto:amilano...@rim.com>
[www.rim.com]<http://www.rim.com/>[cid:image001.png@01CB37B8.EC492
auto=add
Regards,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: users-bounces+amilanoski=rim@lists.strongswan.org
[mailto:users-bounces+amilanoski=rim@lists.strongswan.org] On Behalf Of
Adrian Milanoski
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 1:51 PM
To: Martin Willi
Cc: users
Martin,
Ipv4 ip_forward is enabled
Regards,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: users-bounces+amilanoski=rim@lists.strongswan.org
[mailto:users-bounces+amilanoski=rim@lists.strongswan.org] On Behalf Of
Adrian Milanoski
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 1:35 PM
To: Martin
How can I check to see if that is enabled?
I will try googling now in parallel
Thank you for the response
Regards,
Adrian Milanoski
Short Range Protocols
WLAN IOT / Pre-Cert
Lab Administrator
Research In Motion Limited
Tel. (289) 261-5801
Email amilano...@rim.com
Can anyone assist with this issue?
Thanks,
Adrian
From: users-bounces+amilanoski=rim@lists.strongswan.org
[mailto:users-bounces+amilanoski=rim@lists.strongswan.org] On Behalf Of
Adrian Milanoski
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:18 PM
To: users@lists.strongswan.org
Subject
Hello all,
I have been part of this list for maybe the last 6 months or so and have learn
a few things from the on going discussions.
Finally I have my own issue, which has been an issue for my setup since I
configured it.
My GW is configured with IKEv2 PSK and I can authenticate without any
36 matches
Mail list logo