Thanks Tobias, We will include those changes. If we change the reserved fields to to zero for the same given test-case it works fine. Would it then be a parse issue?
Regards,
Rashmi Narasimhan
|------------>
| From: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tobias Brunner <tob...@strongswan.org>
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Richard Knight/Austin/i...@ibmus
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Martin Willi <mar...@strongswan.org>, Rashmi Narasimhan/Austin/i...@ibmus,
users@lists.strongswan.org |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|06/29/2010 11:56 AM
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Re: [strongSwan] non-zero reserved fields in IKE_AUTH response.
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Hi Richard,
from the log it looks like the ID is parsed incorrectly (you could increase
the
loglevel to see the details):
09[AUD] authentication of '2001:db8:f:1::1f5c57111eaff84b7' with pre-shared
key
failed
The reason for this could be an alignment issue in the parser that has been
fixed in [1] (4.3.1 was the first release to contain that fix). Since you
are
running 4.1.10 on an embedded platform, there might well be other alignment
issues that have since been fixed, so please be aware.
Regards,
Tobias
[1] http://git.strongswan.org/?p=strongswan.git;a=commitdiff;h=42748858
--
======================================================================
Tobias Brunner tob...@strongswan.org
strongSwan - The Linux VPN Solution! http://www.strongswan.org
======================================================================
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
<<inline: ecblank.gif>>
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.strongswan.org https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
