Hi Matthias,
> at least the 4.4.0 patch does not cleanly apply and fails at
> ietf_attributes.c
Indeed. Pushed a clean patch to:
http://download.strongswan.org/patches/08_snprintf_patch/strongswan-4.4.0_snprintf.patch
Regards
Martin
___
Users mailin
Hi,
are the patches needed for FreeBSD 8.1 support also integrated?
Thanks & kind regards,
Holger
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Andreas Steffen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are happy to announce the strongSwan 4.4.1 release which
> offers a couple of new features and fixes a major potential
> vulnerability
Hi Holger,
> are the patches needed for FreeBSD 8.1 support also integrated?
Yes.
Regards,
Tobias
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.strongswan.org
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,
On Monday, 2. August 2010 16:14:51 Andreas Steffen wrote:
> - snprintf vulnerability
>--
>
>A potential remote code execution vulnerability resulting from
>the misuse of snprintf() was fixed. The vulnerability was
>introduced with the strongswan-4.3.3 re
Hi.
I am currently preparing a security bump for the 4.3.6 and 4.4.0 packages in
Gentoo
using the supplied patches but at least the 4.4.0 patch does not cleanly apply
and
fails at ietf_attributes.c (libstrongswan/credentials/ietf_attributes). Could
you
please have a look at the patch and correc
Hi,
we are happy to announce the strongSwan 4.4.1 release which
offers a couple of new features and fixes a major potential
vulnerability that was introduced with strongSwan 4.3.3:
- Support of XFRM marks
-
The Linux 2.6.34 kernel introduced XFRM marks in IPsec SAs and
