Hi,
all the different approaches like local traffic LBs, client wrappers with
gateway failure detection and even multiple simultaneous tunnels from the
client to different gateways have been on the table, were evaluated and most of
them are already in use in other projects successfully.
The D
Am 16.09.2018 um 13:23 schrieb Markus P. Beckhaus:
> Hi Michael,
>
> thanks for your fast reply. The background of my question is to implement
> failover with strongswan standard mechanisms wherever possible.
>
> In fact I do have *swan implementations in the field with wrappers for load
> distri
Hi Michael,
thanks for your fast reply. The background of my question is to implement
failover with strongswan standard mechanisms wherever possible.
In fact I do have *swan implementations in the field with wrappers for load
distribution and failover, but I'd rather get rid of as much individu
Am 16.09.2018 um 09:34 schrieb Markus P. Beckhaus:
> Dear all,
>
> we are thinking about using a DNS Load-Balancer to distribute a huge count of
> strongswan clients to multiple VPN gatweways. Also, the DNS Load-Balancer
> should detect the failure of VPN gateways and remove them from the DNS
>
Dear all,
we are thinking about using a DNS Load-Balancer to distribute a huge count of
strongswan clients to multiple VPN gatweways. Also, the DNS Load-Balancer
should detect the failure of VPN gateways and remove them from the DNS
responses, thus poviding a kind of availability and failover.
