> Is there any reason why UDP checksum in the packet shows as wrong in the
> wireshark?
Possibly hardware checksum offloading [1].
Regards,
Tobias
[1] https://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup/Offloading
<balaji.thoguluva.bapu...@oracle.com>;
users@lists.strongswan.org
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] IKE_SA_INIT response with notification data missing
Hi Balaji,
RFC 4739 "Multiple Authenticaton Exchanges in IKEv2"
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4739#section-3.1
defines the format of the MULTI
Hi Balaji,
RFC 4739 "Multiple Authenticaton Exchanges in IKEv2"
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4739#section-3.1
defines the format of the MULTIPLE_AUTH_SUPPORT Notify Payload as
3.1. MULTIPLE_AUTH_SUPPORTED Notify Payload
The MULTIPLE_AUTH_SUPPORTED notification is included in the
Also the UDP checksum in the IKE_SA_INIT response shows incorrect in wireshark.
From: Balaji Thoguluva Bapulal
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2018 10:42 PM
To: users@lists.strongswan.org
Subject: IKE_SA_INIT response with notification data missing
Dear users,
I am trying to establish a
