Re: [strongSwan] NAT-T and StrongSwan conf

2011-11-14 Thread Alex Lucas
Thank you for your help and suggestions guys, got it working with OpenSwan. On 09/11/11 10:55, Alex Lucas wrote: Dears, No ideas? I've tried a lot of combinations of config, including specifying very specific IPs for left, leftsubnet, right, rightsubnet, rightid etc. The docs are not too

Re: [strongSwan] NAT-T and StrongSwan conf

2011-11-14 Thread Tobias Brunner
Hi Alex, Thank you for your help and suggestions guys, got it working with OpenSwan. Interesting. Would you care to share the config that enabled you to do this with OpenSwan? Because I'm pretty sure L2TP/IPsec with destination NAT (i.e. the responder behind a NAT) is currently not possible

Re: [strongSwan] NAT-T and StrongSwan conf

2011-11-14 Thread Alex Lucas
Hi Tobias, OpenSwan ipsec.conf: config setup nat_traversal=yes protostack=netkey conn psk-nat rightsubnet=vhost:%priv also=psk-nonat conn psk-nonat authby=secret pfs=no auto=add keyingtries=3 rekey=no dpddelay=5 dpdtimeout=10

Re: [strongSwan] NAT-T and StrongSwan conf

2011-11-08 Thread Alex Lucas
Dears, No ideas? I've tried a lot of combinations of config, including specifying very specific IPs for left, leftsubnet, right, rightsubnet, rightid etc. The docs are not too helpful for NAT or especially double-NAT (which seems to be the case here) scenarios. BR, Alex On 02/11/11 10:07,

[strongSwan] NAT-T and StrongSwan conf

2011-11-01 Thread Alex Lucas
Hi, The NAT-T stuff is very complicated. My VPN server is behind a router and I enabled port forwarding for ports 500/udp, 4500/udp. Now when I connect via Internet, I get the following log: Nov 2 09:58:09 vpntest.local pluto[3745]: L2TP[1] 10.100.30.1:15541 #1: responding to Main Mode from