quot;
To: "volga629" , "users"
Sent: Thursday, 24 March, 2016 04:31:47
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] ha plugin
Hi Slava,
the Linux kernel still has to be patched whereas no change in iptables
is required. A selection of ha kernel patches can be found here:
https://download.strong
Hi Slava,
the Linux kernel still has to be patched whereas no change in iptables
is required. A selection of ha kernel patches can be found here:
https://download.strongswan.org/testing/
E.g. for a Linux 4.4 or 4.5 kernel apply ha-4.4-abicompat.patch.bz2
and for a Linux 4.2 or 4.3 kernel apply
Hello Everyone,
I am trying build test case with HA plugin and lan2lan tunnel behind nat, but I
want to confirm if patches posted on plugin wiki still required to rebuild
kernel and iptables ?
Slava.
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.strongswan.org
the DPD
mechanism to detect the failure.
What do you think?
Regards,
Emeric
- Mail original -
De: "Emeric POUPON"
À: "Martin Willi"
Cc: users@lists.strongswan.org
Envoyé: Mardi 3 Mars 2015 17:36:13
Objet: Re: [strongSwan] HA plugin: stopping charon does not remove
efore cancelling threads, the job is being
executed and it works as expected: the SA are being deleted on the passive node.
Not sure it is the correct fix for that problem though?
Best Regards,
Emeric
- Mail original -
De: "Emeric POUPON"
À: "Martin Willi"
Cc: users@l
>> In that particular configuration (no monitoring/heartbeat) stopping
>> charon on the active node should clear the connections on the remote
>> gateway (OK) and on the other node (not OK), right?
>
>The active node will delete the IKE_SA, and send a close event to the
>passive node.
>
That is wh
Hi,
> In that particular configuration (no monitoring/heartbeat) stopping
> charon on the active node should clear the connections on the remote
> gateway (OK) and on the other node (not OK), right?
The active node will delete the IKE_SA, and send a close event to the
passive node.
If you are no
artin Willi"
À: "Emeric POUPON"
Cc: users@lists.strongswan.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 27 Février 2015 16:27:02
Objet: Re: [strongSwan] HA plugin: stopping charon does not remove
IKE_SA/CHILD_SA from other nodes
> When charon is stopped on one of the nodes, DELETE are sent to the remote
>
> When charon is stopped on one of the nodes, DELETE are sent to the remote
> hosts:
Actually, it should not if it has an active heartbeat connection with
the other node. If a node knows that another node is active, it should
deactivate all responsible segments locally before shutting down, and
Hello,
I have set a HA cluster using strongswan 5.2.2.
When charon is stopped on one of the nodes, DELETE are sent to the remote hosts:
Feb 27 15:14:34 00[DMN] signal of type SIGINT received. Shutting down
Feb 27 15:14:34 00[MGR] going to destroy IKE_SA manager and all managed IKE_SA's
Feb 27 15
10 matches
Mail list logo
