rand Pradhan
> Sent: March 20, 2020 1:50 PM
> To: Noel Kuntze ;
> users@lists.strongswan.org
> Subject: RE: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tunnel established but packets are not
> routed. V2 works.
>
> Tx for the clarification. All information per the wiki is attached.
>
> Kin
us immediately, and permanently destroy this
> message and any copies you may have. Warning: Email may not be secure unless
> properly encrypted.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel Kuntze
> Sent: March 20, 2020 11:23 AM
> To: Makarand Pradhan ;
> users@list
not be secure unless properly
encrypted.
-Original Message-
From: Noel Kuntze
Sent: March 20, 2020 1:21 PM
To: Makarand Pradhan ; users@lists.strongswan.org
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tunnel established but packets are not routed.
V2 works.
Please send all the data I asked for
y us immediately, and permanently destroy this
> message and any copies you may have. Warning: Email may not be secure unless
> properly encrypted.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel Kuntze
> Sent: March 20, 2020 11:23 AM
> To: Makarand Pradhan ; users@lists.strong
untze
Sent: March 20, 2020 11:23 AM
To: Makarand Pradhan ; users@lists.strongswan.org
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tunnel established but packets are not routed.
V2 works.
Please provide all information as shown on the HelpRequests[1] page. Then we
can go onwards with finding the source of the
There is a page at the strongswan site that talks about different options for
route-based tunneling (Google it), which is what I think you want... You could
tie the IP Xfrm activity to a virtual interface... Vti-based, xfrm-based, or
tun-tap based.I think you may want to look at that.Also, is th
e secure unless
> properly encrypted.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Noel Kuntze
> Sent: March 20, 2020 11:15 AM
> To: Makarand Pradhan ; users@lists.strongswan.org
> Subject: Re: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tunnel established but packets are not
> routed. V2 works.
&g
message and any copies you may have. Warning: Email may not be secure unless
> properly encrypted.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Users On Behalf Of Makarand Pradhan
> Sent: March 19, 2020 4:07 PM
> To: users@lists.strongswan.org
> Subject: Re: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tu
, and permanently destroy this
> message and any copies you may have. Warning: Email may not be secure unless
> properly encrypted.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Users On Behalf Of Makarand
> Pradhan
> Sent: March 19, 2020 4:07 PM
> To: users@lists.strongswan.org
-
From: Users On Behalf Of Makarand Pradhan
Sent: March 19, 2020 4:07 PM
To: users@lists.strongswan.org
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tunnel established but packets are not routed.
V2 works.
Hi All,
The wiki gave me a hint. The issue was route. For v1 the remote protected
network route
: March 19, 2020 2:28 PM
To: users@lists.strongswan.org
Subject: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tunnel established but packets are not routed. V2
works.
Hi All,
I'm having a unique issue. Tunnel is up but packets are not routed when version
is ikev1. When I set the version to ikev2, then packets ente
Hi All,
I'm having a unique issue. Tunnel is up but packets are not routed when version
is ikev1. When I set the version to ikev2, then packets enter the tunnel as
expected.
Config is as follows:
Running StrongSwan 5.8.2.
PC - Router1 - Router2 - Tunnel - Router3 - Router4 - PC
Ipsec.conf:
c
12 matches
Mail list logo
