Re: Simple properties question...

2004-01-10 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I faced similar fustrations, so created a wiki page to document findings. http://wiki.codehaus.org/maven/WritingMavenXml Perhaps you could add to this ;-) Stephen From: Brian Topping [EMAIL PROTECTED] Q1: Is there some hidden cache of knowledge that I could have learned that from?

Can not generate 'Developer activity report'

2004-01-10 Thread Ranjan Chakrabrty
Hello, When I generate the site using maven,all the data in the reports are generated except the data in the developer activity report. Do I need to add something else in the project.xml ? Thank you. Ranjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs:

Re: Simple properties question...

2004-01-10 Thread __matthewHawthorne
Incze Lajos wrote: In the long run and in the new Maven code I won't be promoting Jelly for plugins at all, but will be promoting the use of beanshell. I'm sure XML programming will remain wildly popular and if that is the case I will be reimplementing Jelly taking it down to the bare metal with

Re: Can not generate 'Developer activity report'

2004-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
id declare for developers in your project.xml and id present in the changelog output must match. Emmanuel - Original Message - From: Ranjan Chakrabrty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: ranjan-yahoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 3:20 AM Subject: Can not

Re: Simple properties question...

2004-01-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 07:36, Stephen Colebourne wrote: From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's all good on paper, but beanshell 2.0 in my mind is the option I'm leaning toward right now simply because it's gone though an iteration or two. But who knows in time. At this point in time I'm

Re: Simple properties question...

2004-01-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 21:23, __matthewHawthorne wrote: I agree that Jelly is a bit rough and that Groovy looks awesome. I've used Beanshell a bit, and it's OK, but something just seems to be missing. Jason, do you have any thoughts on using something like BSF for the plugins? You be

Good Karma

2004-01-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
Howdy, I'll be heading out to San Jose for the 20th of January to participate in an advanced AspectJ patterns workshop being put on by Wes Isberg who is gracious enough to volunteer his time for AspectJ users. So in an effort maintain the balance if anyone is even vaguely interested in knowing

RE: Scripting [was Simple properties question...]

2004-01-10 Thread Steve Garcia
I know little about these tools mentioned recently like Beanshell, OGNL, Groovy, etc. Although I recently downloaded Beanshell and it appears to be a brillant application. It's like writing shell scripts in Java. Anyway, if Maven moves away from Jelly and into Beanshell (or whatever other

RE: Scripting [was Simple properties question...]

2004-01-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 12:55, Steve Garcia wrote: I know little about these tools mentioned recently like Beanshell, OGNL, Groovy, etc. Although I recently downloaded Beanshell and it appears to be a brillant application. It's like writing shell scripts in Java. Yes, very similiar to what

RE: Dependency issues for junit tests [brain dump]

2004-01-10 Thread Steve Garcia
The type and kind elements are really doing the same function which is really providing attribute information of a sort. I honestly don't think you would gain more with several kind elements over several type elements. What has happened though is the type has come to represent part

Re: Dependency issues for junit tests [brain dump]

2004-01-10 Thread Stephen McConnell
Steve Garcia wrote: See note at the end The type and kind elements are really doing the same function which is really providing attribute information of a sort. I honestly don't think you would gain more with several kind elements over several type elements. What has happened though is

RE: Mutliple source directories in project.xml

2004-01-10 Thread John Casey
It seems to me that the POM is the wrong place to put anything related to artifacts created during maven execution. I'd even go so far as to say that the list of reports to be generated doesn't belong in here. To me, it makes sense to have the POM describe the project itself, in pure terms,

RE: Simple properties question...

2004-01-10 Thread Brian Topping
Thanks! I added something there. -b -Original Message- From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 7:33 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Simple properties question... I faced similar fustrations, so created a wiki page to document

Stupid Q's #2: What is an Action Definition?

2004-01-10 Thread Brian Topping
Hi all, Just wondering if anyone can explain what an action definition is? I've got a subproject that simply provides a jar for a source generation step. I would have rather had an exploded JAR sitting around and have the directory available to the generator, but I couldn't figure that out, so

Re: Stupid Q's #2: What is an Action Definition?

2004-01-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 23:35, Brian Topping wrote: Hi all, Just wondering if anyone can explain what an action definition is? This is the unit of work in Werkz. Within the context of Maven, the body of a goal is the action. It is a blob of Jelly which is stored until the goal chain is

RE: Stupid Q's #2: What is an Action Definition?

2004-01-10 Thread Brian Topping
-Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stupid Q's #2: What is an Action Definition? BUILD FAILED ... Goal [test:test] has no action definition. Some times the cache gets whacked if you interrupt a build and the pointers among goals