I faced similar fustrations, so created a wiki page to document findings.
http://wiki.codehaus.org/maven/WritingMavenXml
Perhaps you could add to this ;-)
Stephen
From: Brian Topping [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Q1: Is there some hidden cache of knowledge that I could have learned that
from?
Hello,
When I generate the site using maven,all the data
in the reports are generated except the data in the
developer activity report. Do I need to add something
else in the project.xml ?
Thank you.
Ranjan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs:
Incze Lajos wrote:
In the long run and in the new Maven code I won't be promoting Jelly for
plugins at all, but will be promoting the use of beanshell. I'm sure XML
programming will remain wildly popular and if that is the case I will be
reimplementing Jelly taking it down to the bare metal with
id declare for developers in your project.xml and id present in the
changelog output must match.
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: Ranjan Chakrabrty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ranjan-yahoo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 3:20 AM
Subject: Can not
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 07:36, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's all good on paper, but beanshell 2.0 in my mind is the option I'm
leaning toward right now simply because it's gone though an iteration or
two. But who knows in time. At this point in time I'm
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 21:23, __matthewHawthorne wrote:
I agree that Jelly is a bit rough and that Groovy looks awesome. I've
used Beanshell a bit, and it's OK, but something just seems to be missing.
Jason, do you have any thoughts on using something like BSF for the
plugins?
You be
Howdy,
I'll be heading out to San Jose for the 20th of January to participate
in an advanced AspectJ patterns workshop being put on by Wes Isberg who
is gracious enough to volunteer his time for AspectJ users.
So in an effort maintain the balance if anyone is even vaguely
interested in knowing
I know little about these tools mentioned recently like Beanshell, OGNL,
Groovy, etc. Although I recently downloaded Beanshell and it appears to be
a brillant application. It's like writing shell scripts in Java.
Anyway, if Maven moves away from Jelly and into Beanshell (or whatever other
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 12:55, Steve Garcia wrote:
I know little about these tools mentioned recently like Beanshell, OGNL,
Groovy, etc. Although I recently downloaded Beanshell and it appears to be
a brillant application. It's like writing shell scripts in Java.
Yes, very similiar to what
The type and kind elements are really doing the same
function which is really providing attribute information of a sort.
I honestly don't think you would gain more with several
kind elements over several type elements.
What has happened though is the type has come to represent
part
Steve Garcia wrote:
See note at the end
The type and kind elements are really doing the same
function which is really providing attribute information of a sort.
I honestly don't think you would gain more with several
kind elements over several type elements.
What has happened though is
It seems to me that the POM is the wrong place to put anything related
to artifacts created during maven execution. I'd even go so far as to
say that the list of reports to be generated doesn't belong in here. To
me, it makes sense to have the POM describe the project itself, in pure
terms,
Thanks! I added something there.
-b
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 7:33 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Simple properties question...
I faced similar fustrations, so created a wiki page to
document
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone can explain what an action definition is? I've
got a subproject that simply provides a jar for a source generation step. I
would have rather had an exploded JAR sitting around and have the directory
available to the generator, but I couldn't figure that out, so
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 23:35, Brian Topping wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone can explain what an action definition is?
This is the unit of work in Werkz. Within the context of Maven, the body
of a goal is the action. It is a blob of Jelly which is stored until the
goal chain is
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid Q's #2: What is an Action Definition?
BUILD FAILED
...
Goal [test:test] has no action definition.
Some times the cache gets whacked if you interrupt a build and the
pointers among goals
16 matches
Mail list logo