RE: Questions on SNAPSHOTs

2010-10-16 Thread Brian.Levine
Right, it's more the coders that I'm concerned about. So "never" seems like the best solution. I guess "never" actually means "once" if you never had the artifact locally. It seems like the dependency rules might benefit from some knowledge of whether the artifact in the local repository was t

Re: Questions on SNAPSHOTs

2010-10-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Oct 16, 2010, at 8:00 PM, wrote: > Thank you Vincent. This is what I thought, but just wanted to confirm. IMHO, > having your local dependencies change out from under you is counter-intuitive > especially when you're building that component locally. So setting the > snapshot dependency to

RE: Questions on SNAPSHOTs

2010-10-16 Thread Brian.Levine
Thank you Vincent. This is what I thought, but just wanted to confirm. IMHO, having your local dependencies change out from under you is counter-intuitive especially when you're building that component locally. So setting the snapshot dependency to "never" seems like it would produce a more int

Re: Questions on SNAPSHOTs

2010-10-16 Thread Vincent Latombe
Hello Brian What you assume is right : if the timestamp of a remote artifact is more recent than the timestamp of a local artifact (under .m2), it will download the version from the remote repository. This will be happening depending on the updatePolicy (daily by default), or if you add -U flag to

Re: Maven 3 and site generation

2010-10-16 Thread Jörg Hohwiller
On 16.10.2010 09:05, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, Yes I agree, it's very noisy : the report project-info-reports:dependencies must ignore target/classes directories coming from reactors. Can you load a jira entry ? Thanks, Hi, I will do some more evaluation and then raise ticket(s). So far I am ve

RE: Questions on SNAPSHOTs

2010-10-16 Thread Brian.Levine
I know what it's called. It was a mistake. I apologized. That's about the best I can do. I hope the list will forgive me and the next response will attempt to answer my questions. -b From: ext Brian Topping [topp...@codehaus.org] Sent: Saturday, Octob

Re: Questions on SNAPSHOTs

2010-10-16 Thread Brian Topping
On Oct 16, 2010, at 4:42 PM, wrote: > That's what I get for trying to save a step by replying to someone else's > post, but forgetting to change the subject :-[ That's called "thread hijacking", and the problem with it is that the mail you create will show up in everyone's inbox and every lis

Questions on SNAPSHOTs

2010-10-16 Thread Brian.Levine
My apologies for my previous post. That's what I get for trying to save a step by replying to someone else's post, but forgetting to change the subject :-[ Hi all, I could use some clarification on how SNAPSHOTs work. Scenario: - Maven 2.2.1 - componentB depends on componentA, both are being

RE: Maven 3 and site generation

2010-10-16 Thread Brian.Levine
Hi all, I could use some clarification on how SNAPSHOTs work. Scenario: - Maven 2.2.1 - componentB depends on componentA, both are being built as snapshot versions. - I have the source code for both components locally and have built and installed both to my local repo (mvn install) - Both compo

Re: Maven 3 and site generation

2010-10-16 Thread Thiago Moreira (timba)
I think I'm in the same boat... I found the following resources that helped me out to fix some of the problems https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-and-site-plugin.html http://maven.apache.org/doxia/references/doxia-apt.html

Re: maven is a swamp

2010-10-16 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Kenneth McDonald wrote: > 1) Maven is declarative vs. procedural. This is great, but Prolog has been > that > way for decades. Why build such a complex syntax when a much simpler one > already existed. That's comparing apples and peaches. Prolog is a general-pur

Re: Maven 3.0 and checkstyle plugin

2010-10-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
My guess is that your configuration is in the wrong place. Have you read the "Maven 3 Compatibility Notes" and "Maven 3 and Site Plugin"? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+Notes https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+and+site+plugin Is

Re: Maven 3 and site generation

2010-10-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, Yes I agree, it's very noisy : the report project-info-reports:dependencies must ignore target/classes directories coming from reactors. Can you load a jira entry ? Thanks, -- Olivier http://twitter.com/olamy http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy 2010/10/16 Jörg Hohwiller : > Hi there, > > I wen